Dont you mean reflex sweep Kirk If one limb is not way thicker than the other I say a bit more deflex before the reflex.
The terminology is kind of used loosely Mike. Sorry about that….
I’m referring to just the limb shape. The reflex in the tip, vs the deflex in the belly of the limb, or what I call deflex sweep.
What’s happening is …..the more bend you put in that unbraced limb, the stronger it gets. Theoretically this can provide much higher performance using less mass weight in the limb. And that theory proves true….The same concept was used in the ACX system OL AdCock came up with years ago. Only it was done in the cross section of the limb.
The down side to using limb shape geometry to reduce mass limb weight for better performance is the stability loss. There is a trade off there…. There are a lot of bowyers that still do this and use carbon to maintain torsional stability, but they are still floppy vertically. I guess some folks don’t mind having floppy limbs.
I’ve had much better luck using a bit flatter limb pad angle with less bend in the mid section of the limb, and push the reflex portion towards the tips more using almost a flat section in the working limb area……. This is nothing new either….
Take a Look at the old “Severn Balistic” design that was built years ago…. Those bows were hot! And…. Rock solid.
I don’t believe there is a right or wrong way to do this stuff, but if you tinker with tweaking the limb shape long enough you’ll find something you like and run with it…. My .02 cents…
Kirk