3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?  (Read 2158 times)

Offline goose_

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 38
I’ll preface this tuning talk by saying that I’m left handed. Initially after getting a trad bow again I used the three rivers spine calculator to find an arrow. Set up: 70s bear Kodiak mag 48 lbs at 28. Brace height 8 inches.  I’m drawing about 29 when my back tension is on. The arrow I settled on was a carbon express predator 2 in 4560, 100 grain insert and 125 point.(400 spine) In bareshafting, I moved up to 150, and I’m still getting my bare shaft nock left, but point of impact is right on. So my question is, move up to 175 of leave well enough alone? Maybe go down to 3050 (500) spine?

Offline Fireman2019

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Arrow length? When you say you moved up to 150, are you saying you went from a 125grn head to a 150grn head?
Craig
Stalker Wolverine FXT 50@28”
English Walnut and Cocobolo
Black Widow PCHx 51@28"
Zircote and Tiger Myrtle

Online McDave

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6085
What is the length of your bow?  I was wondering if it was one of the short Kodiaks, which might be difficult to tune, particularly for someone with a 29” draw length.

Normally, your setup would call for a .500 spine shaft with a 125-150 grain point.  However, .400 spine shafts with a heavier point and longer length might work. I would start tuning them full length, if I were you, and try 175 or 200 grain points.  You want to be sure you're starting to tune with a true weak and not a false weak.  Right now, your shaft is showing stiff for a LH shooter, but it is always nice to be able to find a true weak shaft and then back off from it a little.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Technology....the knack of arranging the world so that we don't have to experience it.

Offline goose_

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 38
30 inch shaft, uncut. 52 inch Kodiak mag. Yes, I went up to 150 grain point.

Online McDave

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6085
I'm not sure that you will ever be able to bare shaft tune a 52” bow that you draw to 29”.  You may just have to observe the flight of fletched arrows and stop when it is “good enough.”
TGMM Family of the Bow

Technology....the knack of arranging the world so that we don't have to experience it.

Offline Fireman2019

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 57
I would start with a 32 inch shaft. 29” may be too short. You can cut it down in 1/4” increments until you get it to tune.
Craig
Stalker Wolverine FXT 50@28”
English Walnut and Cocobolo
Black Widow PCHx 51@28"
Zircote and Tiger Myrtle

Offline goose_

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 38
Thanks. These arrows only come in at 30. I might go for a different set up then. Trying to get something ironed out before turkey season. My end goal was to run about a 100 grain insert and a 125 to 150 point. What might be a good place to start? Archery shop near me isn’t the greatest, I order everything from three rivers and Lancaster.

Online McDave

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6085
Thanks. These arrows only come in at 30. I might go for a different set up then. Trying to get something ironed out before turkey season. My end goal was to run about a 100 grain insert and a 125 to 150 point. What might be a good place to start? Archery shop near me isn’t the greatest, I order everything from three rivers and Lancaster.

Is 225-250 weight in front with a 30” .400 shaft what you are already using?  I got the impression you were working up to that.  If you haven't already tried that, by all means start with a 30” shaft with 250 grains up front and see what happens.  That might give you a weak response, and then you would be home free.  If it still gives you a stiff response, then try .500.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Technology....the knack of arranging the world so that we don't have to experience it.

Offline goose_

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 38
Yes, .400 spine (4560) with 100 grain insert and 150 grain tip.

Offline Fireman2019

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Sure seems like you should be getting a weak spine result. Something else may need tweaked aside from the arrow.
Craig
Stalker Wolverine FXT 50@28”
English Walnut and Cocobolo
Black Widow PCHx 51@28"
Zircote and Tiger Myrtle

Offline goose_

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 38
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2023, 02:12:27 PM »
Like what?

Online Vroomvroom

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 251
  • Moose outfitter
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2023, 02:33:28 PM »
I’m interested on what you come up with as this was similar to my questions in an earlier post. I’m shooting a Martin savannah, drawing last I remember about 52-53 lbs and about 26-27”.  I had full length gt traditionals .400 spine using 50 gr inserts and 125 gr heads.    So similar.   When I got to a shaft of 30.75” from nock throat to end of insert my bare shaft seemed decent at about 12 to 15 yards.    The way I read the gt recurve spine chart, I’m suppose to have on border of .400-340. But most saying I’d have better luck with .500s like your being told.  Unfortunately I’ll be thinking about this now the whole two weeks I’m away from home. I too would almost like to order some .500s now to try.  I wish I could of shot my fletched arrow at 50 yards or more just to see flight before I left.   Looking to see what results you get.

Offline Fireman2019

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2023, 03:02:25 PM »
Like what?
Grip, shelf (is it built out or are you getting to much contact), your release (are you creeping forward), maybe you are torquing the string, etc. You could try paper tuning to see what the tears look like. I have been in the compound world most of my life, a bad grip was easily noticeable while paper tuning. With my recurve, I found that same issue. I can really notice it while paper tuning.
Craig
Stalker Wolverine FXT 50@28”
English Walnut and Cocobolo
Black Widow PCHx 51@28"
Zircote and Tiger Myrtle

Offline Firstlight

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 284
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2023, 07:44:07 PM »
Most bare shaft methods I’m aware of suggest ignoring the nock and going by point of impact. Slightly weak is in theory more forgiving as the arrow will stiffen up with fletch.

Offline Firstlight

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 284
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #14 on: March 07, 2023, 07:49:46 PM »
Here is a really good article, scroll down to bare shaft planing…

https://www.fenderarchery.com/blogs/archery-info/basic-tuning

Online Vroomvroom

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 251
  • Moose outfitter
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2023, 07:53:46 PM »
I saw it somewhere where guys would put arrow on a table Point Down, push down on the arrow to flex it, and apparently it should bend one way.  They mark that. And ensure that’s facing out so when the arrow initially flexes upon shooting, the arrow initially bends away from the riser. Do anyone do that. I was told if it seems like I got weak shafts using these .400s with 175 total point weight and arrows 30 + inches long Is because I may have a false reading. Sure wish I could shoot that now to check again.   Must wait two weeks now….
« Last Edit: March 07, 2023, 08:19:06 PM by Vroomvroom »

Offline goose_

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 38
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #16 on: March 07, 2023, 07:54:19 PM »
Most bare shaft methods I’m aware of suggest ignoring the nock and going by point of impact. Slightly weak is in theory more forgiving as the arrow will stiffen up with fletch.

This was kinda my thing... obviously I can put them where they need to be if I do my part right, do I need to split hairs and have them straight in the target?


That being said, I upped to around 300 grains on the front of the .400. that's a 11 grain insert and a 300 grain field point, I'm gonna see how those shoot tomorrow morning, ill be back with pics. I dont think I want to go more than 300 up front, so if this doesn't work I may consider switching shafts.

Offline goose_

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 38
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #17 on: March 07, 2023, 08:01:55 PM »
Here is a really good article, scroll down to bare shaft planing…

https://www.fenderarchery.com/blogs/archery-info/basic-tuning

this was very insightful and simple. I will bookmark it. thank you sir.

Offline Firstlight

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 284
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #18 on: March 07, 2023, 08:21:14 PM »
For me when bare shafting, I start at 20 yards. When flying good I move back to 25 yards, and usually go back to 30 yards.  Generally I hope to end up slightly weak but my last round of bare shafting at 30, point of impact for the bare shaft was grouping with fletch, so in theory I’m a little stiff, but I’ll live with it.  I may play a bit with brace height and try and weaken the bare shat a little. I’m a believer too that if bare shaft is groping a little low, a small adjustment in my tie on nock is in order, moving it down.

Online Friend

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8133
Re: What is considered “good enough” when it comes to bare shafting?
« Reply #19 on: March 07, 2023, 11:09:48 PM »
If my bare shafts share the same mark as my fletched shafts at 35 yards, regardless of nock position; I access the tuning as golden. My broadhead tipped arrows will fly beautifully well beyond my effective hunting range.
>>----> Friend <----<<

My Lands… Are Where My Dead Lie Buried.......Crazy Horse

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©