Author Topic: Core lam guesses  (Read 1340 times)

Offline m&m

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 15
Core lam guesses
« on: November 18, 2023, 08:27:29 PM »
Here’s what I’ve got on hand .050 glass. Design is 60” 59 Kodiak , wanting 55# @ 28”
Any educated guess on what core stack should work?

Online Kirkll

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2337
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2023, 09:41:01 PM »
There are many different things that could effect your core thickness. The actual shape of the limb, riser length from fade tip to fade tip, taper rate being used, tip wedges used, or not, Length of working limb, location of string notches, and where exactly are you measuring the limb thickness?

Need more info to even venture a guess…. Kirk
Big Foot Bows
Traditional Archery
[email protected]
http://bigfootbows.com/b/bows/

Offline Mad Max

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6565
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2023, 07:58:49 AM »
.250
I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

Online Kirkll

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2337
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2023, 02:33:46 PM »
Big Foot Bows
Traditional Archery
[email protected]
http://bigfootbows.com/b/bows/

Offline garyschuler

Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2023, 10:27:43 PM »
Seeing how you are wanting a guess, i’ll guess .250” at the fades. Now build it and tell me how close i am. Then you know about how much give or take to change it on the next one. There’s my guess lol !!! Good luck!!
Gary Schuler

Online kennym

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17314
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2023, 08:07:32 AM »
I think I'd do some measuring on a  60” 59 Kodiak if you can get hold of one, then you should be close ...

I looked at Binghams chart for a 60" recurve and it showed .274 total  including glass and cores I believe, don't know what thickness they used.

Sorry, not a recurve guy...
Stay sharp, Kenny.

   https://www.kennysarchery.com/

Offline garyschuler

Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2023, 06:40:11 PM »
I’ve got a 58# 62” Kodiak Special. It’s .270” at the fades, so i think .250” is in the ball park. Maybe .255”.
Unless you change riser length or Limb width, wide tips hook length. Or , or ,or !!!
Gary Schuler

Offline m&m

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 15
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2023, 08:40:02 PM »
Thanks for the guesses, I do have a 59 repro 58#@28 it measures.250 just past fades and .250 in center of hooks . Not positive on glass thickness. Gonna try two core lams .060 no taper and see what happens.

Offline m&m

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 15
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2023, 09:35:58 PM »
Well, it came out 40@28 I’ll put up a picture when it’s finished.

Offline Mad Max

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6565
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2023, 10:39:47 PM »
.050 glass x 2
.060 core x 2
So you had a .220 stack and got 40#??

This is very accurate AFTER you have and know the stack and weight.
All of us have to guess on the stack for a new form.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2023, 08:47:05 AM by Mad Max »
I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

Online Kirkll

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2337
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2023, 02:56:15 PM »
Hey Max.... Reading the notes on that lam stack calculator at the bottom of the page, it states that lengthening a riser length 1" on a TD bow will increase the draw weight 3.5#, and decreasing it will decrease the weight......   What's up with that?

That doesn't seem right to me...  I build my different length risers in 2" increments and have a totally different
experience with the longer bows having a lighter draw weight at the same draw length.   

BUT..... i use that calculator a lot, and it's pretty close if you have good data to input.   Kirk
Big Foot Bows
Traditional Archery
[email protected]
http://bigfootbows.com/b/bows/

Offline Mad Max

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6565
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #11 on: December 29, 2023, 03:23:55 PM »
That was a typo and it's out there on there on everyone's Excel word. :biglaugh:

Yeah it works for me too. :thumbsup:
I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

Offline m&m

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 15
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #12 on: December 29, 2023, 08:04:16 PM »
I was going to use .060 but received .055 and came out with 40#
 I’ll get this one finished up gain some more experience and try again, wouldn’t want to do this for anymore than a hobby, a person could starve before he figures it all out.

Offline Mad Max

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6565
Re: Core lam guesses
« Reply #13 on: December 29, 2023, 09:30:15 PM »
I was going to use .060 but received .055 and came out with 40#
 I’ll get this one finished up gain some more experience and try again, wouldn’t want to do this for anymore than a hobby, a person could starve before he figures it all out.

.210 stack =40# then .234 would be for 55# :thumbsup:
I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©