3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?  (Read 4341 times)

Offline George D. Stout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3467
Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« on: January 01, 2007, 11:11:00 AM »
I posted this on a few other sites to compare the answers and opinions.   I'm sure each will be a little different but it will be fun to find out.    ;)  

No....I'm not talking about me. I'm talking about metal riser recurve bows. To you newbies out there, they have been around about fifty years. So let's not even get into the traditional-term aspect. Let's talk curb appeal.
Although I'm a big fan of nice woods, warm risers and sexy lams....I like my metal risers as well; and I think they have a beauty all their own. But you guys know that one man's model, is another man's sisty ugler. Talk it out. Here's a few photos:


 

 

 

 

Offline Otto

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1020
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2007, 11:18:00 AM »
Sleek Beauties to me George.  I like the curves on older women.  Er.. ah.. I mean older bows.
Otto

Offline Chris Wilson

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 368
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2007, 11:19:00 AM »
One of the best shooting bows I owned was a Bear black bear compound riser converted to accept ILF limbs.  It wasn't drop dead gorgeous, but it wasn't butt ugly either.  Man did it shoot!  Kind of kick myself for letting that one go.
   
 
"You're either trained or untrained.  When it hits the fan, you will always fall to the level of your training."

Offline SlowBowinMO

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2540
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2007, 11:38:00 AM »
I think they LOOK good, but when I pick one up...yuck!  I am getting to the point all I want to shoot are one piece bows because I don't like the weight.

I may need to add one of these to my arsenal though, it could be just the ticket for those times when my shooting goes south.
"Down-Log Blind at Misty River"

Offline Dryrot

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2007, 11:41:00 AM »
I've got an old Bear compund I've thought about getting converted to accept some recurve limbs but time and $$$ never seem to come together at the same time.
Larry

Offline LBR

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4221
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2007, 11:48:00 AM »
Looks don't make 'em shoot, but to me no metal riser can come close to looking as good as a nice wood riser.  'Course I've seen some butt-ugly wood risers too.

Chad

Offline robtattoo

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 3588
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2007, 11:50:00 AM »
I couldn't tell you why, but Pic2 is just gorgeous. The rest look awful, to my mind. I know it's about how they shoot & not how they look (Think DAS) but I can't imagine ever looking at a metal riser'd bow & thinking 'WOW! Gotta have one...'

As I say though, number two would be the exception to that! What is it?
"I came into this world, kicking, screaming & covered in someone else's blood. I have no problem going out the same way"

PBS & TBT Member

>>---TGMM, Family of the Bow--->

Offline larry

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1146
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2007, 11:56:00 AM »
pic 1 and 3, butt ugly. pic 2 and 4, not sure I'd clasify them as sleek beauties, but they're nice looking bows.

Offline Dustin Waters

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 555
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2007, 11:58:00 AM »
im gonna go ahead and say BUTT UGLY.. sorry if you own these bows but i think they are ugly.  Either way if they shoot where you want them too then how can you complain much.

Offline vermonster13

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 14572
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2007, 11:58:00 AM »
A bow's true beauty is in the flight of the arrows it launches. After all that's what we actually look at when we shoot them.
TGMM Family of the Bow
For hunting to have a future, we must invest ourselves in future hunters.

Offline jonsimoneau

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2007, 12:25:00 PM »
I think they are pretty ugly.....but I'm a fan of ugly bows that shoot good.  It's like the nerdy guy in highschool who ends up marrying the prom queen!

Offline George D. Stout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3467
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2007, 12:57:00 PM »
Number 2 is a Carroll's, Gentleman Jim Takedown Hunter.  They are one of the sweetest shooting bows you can find.

1.  Phil Grable Golden Eagle
2.  Carroll's
3.  Hoyt
4.  Herter's

I'll add another here that I really like.  It's a Shakespeare (also Phil Grable design.)

 

Offline MW

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 587
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #12 on: January 01, 2007, 01:49:00 PM »
Good, bad, or ugly I don't know.  I guess it is in the eye of the beholder.

Cold yes!

I was just out shooting my Gamemaster and when it is down to 20 it gets cold in a hurry!
<---TGMM Family of the bow---<<<<

Offline Gunney

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 43

Offline Ghostman

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 140
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #14 on: January 01, 2007, 02:06:00 PM »
I've got to go with BUTT UGLY. Metal risers don't do much for me.

Offline George D. Stout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3467
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #15 on: January 01, 2007, 02:08:00 PM »
just as an aside....do you guys who think metal risers are ugly...shoot metal or carbon arrows?  Or do you stay with that beautiful wood?    :saywhat:    :saywhat:

Offline [email protected]

  • Moderator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 287
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #16 on: January 01, 2007, 03:09:00 PM »
I really like the mating of the limbs and riser on the Carroll's bow.

Bob
Beware of all enterprises that require a new suit.

Don't give up what you want most for what you want now.

Offline John Nail

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 740
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #17 on: January 01, 2007, 03:32:00 PM »
I always liked the old Bear metal riser takedowns. I guess a lot of folks did, 'cause they sold a bunch of them.
Only risers I don't care for are the fancy-schmancy ones with glitter and candy colors.....they just look limp-wristed.
Is it too late to be what I could have been?

Offline **DONOTDELETE**

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 10441
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #18 on: January 01, 2007, 07:16:00 PM »
Man thats just eeewwwgly. a metal riser on a bow is like a black polycarbonate stock on a weatherby. blech.

Offline WESTBROOK

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3385
Re: Flat-Out, Butt-Ugly, or Sleek Beauties?
« Reply #19 on: January 01, 2007, 08:45:00 PM »
Metal risers are not attractive at all, but who cares. Had a Sky hunter Supreme, great shooting bow and I liked shooting it, but I didnt like hauling it to the woods, heavy and cold.

Nothin against them, just dont like'em

Eric

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©