Rock hard maple has been an industry standard for many years due to its longevity characteristics. For mass weight to strength properties, you will be hard pressed to find anything better in the natural wood class.
With popular draw weights between 50-70# draw you can realistically use pretty much anything for core wood with fiberglass backing and have it hold up well. Especially building long bows….
But once you get into building high performance static tip recurves, those limbs are storing energy in a much shorter portion of the limb, and the dynamics going on in the core of the limbs are much more extreme. Once you get past 70# it’s the compression of the core next to your belly glass that fails. Using thicker glass is the ticket on heavy bows. Using carbon on the belly typically shears the bond to wood cores even quicker. I’ve tested using carbon over glass before and it’s still tough to get it to hold up long…. The best longevity I’ve come up with so far, and highest compression rating is using thinner maple lams on the belly side.
But I’ve never tried a flat grain laminated approach before, but it makes sense that two .030 lams with epoxy would be stronger than an .060 wood lam by itself.
I’m currently testing this Fossilized bamboo for extreme compression properties on the belly side in hopes of getting some 80-115# limbs to hold up longer. These guys drawing them from 29.5 to 31.5” isn’t making it easier ta boot…. I’m going to mix in some carbon in the core too on the really heavy set. I’m still using 050 glass on the belly though.
Who knows… I may come up with a suitable flight bow before it’s all said and done.
Kirk