Jerry,Doeboy,
REspectfully offered in rebutal, bows have been defined and classified since our seasons were inaugarated as "hand drawn, hand held, in the presence of game."
One needs limited movement to shoot a "string gun". It has a stock, trigger, scope, safety and all one needs to do is flick off the safey and fire.
Sorry. I don't agree there is a direct comparison to a compound. I knew a guy who opened up a .410 shot shell, dumped the pellets and inserted into his single bbl shotgun, stuck a broadhead tipped alum arrow down into the casing and fired it... It was impressive at 70 yards! Doesn't make it a bow! (just trying to lighten the mood here) :rolleyes:
Most of us who have gotten "busted" did so as we were drawing our bow...the movement is what gives us away... granted, a compound with 80% let off can be drawn early and held a "while"...
but those of us who used to shoot wheels know that impeeds accuracy pretty quickly. We read stories of guys unable to hold the bow steady and mmmmissed!
Respectfully, I don't think it's "elitist" at all to suggest that we keep the "arch" in archery and require any weapon used in that special season, for which we pay a premium percentage for a special archery tag all these years, meet the lawfully established requirements of "hand drawn, hand-held in the presence of game!"
It's what makes a bow a bow and not a "string gun." We fought down the "draw locks" that allowed a compound to be drawn at 3/4 draw and locked that way... and a xbow takes that a whole lot farther down the "its not a bow" definition!
Fighting to protect what was and is "archery" for a special "archery season" (which we pay a handsome additional fee), is not being the least bit arbitrary or delimiting! Special seasons are for special weapons. When technology over-reaches that point, those of us who fought to get those seasons and wish to preserve those "special" season, within limits, that, in my opinion, is entirely whole and right to do so!
There are many discussions that ensue. It ranges from the reality that if someone has a physical limitation in PA that prevents their pulling a "bow" then it's so easy to get a doctor to sign off for a crossbow permit, that we know there are abuses. However, it's a risk we embrace because it isn't worth risking holding anyone from the woods with a "legitmate" physical limitation. The other side of it is, that since we have accomodations for those physically in need, the others who would opt for a string gun would be those who choose to NOT put in the time or effort to become proficient with a compound bow or trad equipment.
Additionally, because a X-bow comes in high poundage, having sold them in archery stores to neophytes, I know they believe they can shoot as far as they can see! That tiny cross bow bolt sheds energy fast! Folks with limited ability, knowledge or desire to master special season equipment, should not, by my standards, engage in those special seasons! It's "special" for a reason!
There is little justification, in my opinon, to embrace folks into a special, primative weapons season, who do not have a need for a cross bow and only do so to avoid learning to use the special weapon associated with that season.
Thanks for allowing us to share opposing views to yours, guys.