3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008  (Read 1313 times)

Offline myshootinstinks

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 616
Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« on: November 15, 2008, 11:27:00 AM »
In 1968 I was 12 and an avid slayer of ground squirrels with my 35# Indian recurve. By 1972 I had progressed to deer hunting with a brand-spankin' new Howatt 45#er, (emphasis on hunting, not killing, I didn't actually take a deer with a bow until many years later).
  As I recall, the average bow draw weight in those days was somewhere in the 40s and a 50-55# bow was considered a heavyweight.  I don't think I'm way off on this, just look at all the old Bears, Wings, Howatts, etc on the auction site that are in 40s.
   Nowadays, it looks to me like the average draw is somewhere in the mid-50s.
    What are your thoughts on what has been gained or for that matter, lost? Also, what factors have contributed to this evolution?    :campfire:

Offline OsageDave

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2008, 11:32:00 AM »
Compound bows are probably more prevalent and advanced than they were before.  Some of it could have to do with competing against that the weight of those contraptions.
55#@28 Osage Self-Bow

Offline Bear Heart

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2009
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2008, 11:35:00 AM »
I think it is more of a revolution than an evolution.  Bow weight were once much higher.  My other thought is that the average bowhunter isn't a trad bowhunter.  Those who have chosen to stay traditional work at it more and build those muscles up.  Not just another weapon in the tool bag.
Traditional Bowhunters of Washington
PBS Associate Member
Jairus & Amelia's Dad
"Memories before merchandise!"

Offline OsageDave

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2008, 12:12:00 PM »
Well according to Wikipedia (which never lies!) longbows were upwards of 200#.  Somehow I doubt we are working up to those weights again.   :)

"Many men in medieval England were capable of shooting bows from 670–900 N (150–200 pounds) — deformed skeletons of archers have been studied, revealing spur like growths on their bones where the over-developed muscles pulled."
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longbow
55#@28 Osage Self-Bow

Online Mike Bolin

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1876
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2008, 02:51:00 PM »
Doug, I was not really exposed to bows much as a kid. There were very few deer here in the late 50s and early 60s and hardly anyone deer hunted at all. I do agree with you that a few decades ago, a bow over 50# was considered "heavy". Like you said, the majoritiy of used "vintage" bows you see for sale from the 60s seem to be in the 45-50# range. I think that when the compound  gained popularity alot of folks found they could go up in draw weight and those higher weights kinda bled over into the stickbows. When I first tried a stickbow in the late 70s I was shooting 80# with a compound so I tried to start off with a 76# recurve. Not too much success there! Mike
Centaur longbow 62", 43#@28"
River Raisin Siren, 60", 41#@28"
Osage Selfbow 62", 47#@28
Compton Traditional Bowhunters

Offline centaur

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2008, 03:02:00 PM »
My first bow other than my kid bow back in the 50s was a 45# Bear Grizzly. Try though I might, I never shot a deer with it. In 1968, my armament and targets were somewhat different  :scared:  ; they shot back!
I shot compounds for a couple of years in the 70# range, but quickly tired of them and went back to recurves and longbows. I was younger then, and shot stickbows in the 70# class, but now that I am old and bald, 55# is real comfortable, and does the job as well as my heavier bows did.
If you don't like cops, next time you need help, call Al Sharpton

Offline TomMcDonald

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 670
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2008, 04:50:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by myshootinstinks:
In 1968 I was 12 and an avid slayer of ground squirrels with my 35# Indian recurve. By 1972 I had progressed to deer hunting with a brand-spankin' new Howatt 45#er, (emphasis on hunting, not killing, I didn't actually take a deer with a bow until many years later).
  As I recall, the average bow draw weight in those days was somewhere in the 40s and a 50-55# bow was considered a heavyweight.  I don't think I'm way off on this, just look at all the old Bears, Wings, Howatts, etc on the auction site that are in 40s.
   Nowadays, it looks to me like the average draw is somewhere in the mid-50s.
    What are your thoughts on what has been gained or for that matter lost? Also, what factors have contributed to this evolution?    :campfire:  
Pope in 'Hunting with the Bow and Arrow' suggests using nothing below 60lb (I think).

Offline myshootinstinks

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 616
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2008, 05:06:00 PM »
Dunno 'bout that Tom......  :readit:  

From Hunting with Bow & arrow. By: Saxton Pope


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drawn to the full length of an arrow, which was about twenty-six inches, exclusive of the foreshaft, his bow bent in a perfect arc slightly flattened at the handle. Its pull was about forty-five pounds, and it could shoot an arrow about two hundred yards.

This is not the most powerful type of weapon known to Indians, and even Ishi did make stronger bows when he pleased; but this seemed to be the ideal weight for hunting, and it certainly was adequate in his hands.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline MJB

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1946
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2008, 05:25:00 PM »
I'd say 40-45 in the day. Today mid 50's
A Gobbler yelp Spring or Fall is a long conversation.

Offline TomMcDonald

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 670
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #9 on: November 15, 2008, 05:29:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by myshootinstinks:
Dunno 'bout that Tom......   :readit:  

From Hunting with Bow & arrow. By: Saxton Pope


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drawn to the full length of an arrow, which was about twenty-six inches, exclusive of the foreshaft, his bow bent in a perfect arc slightly flattened at the handle. Its pull was about forty-five pounds, and it could shoot an arrow about two hundred yards.

This is not the most powerful type of weapon known to Indians, and even Ishi did make stronger bows when he pleased; but this seemed to be the ideal weight for hunting, and it certainly was adequate in his hands.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry I meant in the how to build a bow chapters.
I'd have a look but I'm way too lazy.

Offline pseman

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 969
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #10 on: November 15, 2008, 10:40:00 PM »
Were just a lot stronger now a days. I thinks it's all the steroids they pump into the chickens and cows.  :D
Mark Thornton

It doesn't matter how or what you shoot, as long as you hit your target.

Offline Danny Rowan

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 4343
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2008, 01:32:00 AM »
Lots of heavy bows back then also. I shot up to 80# up until a few years ago, now I shoot 60-64# but if I wanted I could still pull and shoot 80#. I know a few people older than my 58 years that still shoot heavy bows.

Danny
"When shooting instinctivly,it matters not which eye is dominant"

Jay Kidwell and Glenn St. Charles

TGMM Family Of The Bow
NRA Life/Patron member
NAHC life member
Retired CPO US Navy 1972-1993
Retired USCBP Supervisory Officer 1999-2017

Offline John McCreary

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 200
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #12 on: November 16, 2008, 04:58:00 AM »
Perhaps age is a factor. In the 60's most of us learned from the previous generation which was aging and just begining to bow hunt in mass.With this older archer going into the woods lower pondage bows became the norm. Ever try to find a '68 Kodiak in 65 pounds? As we "Boomers" { I hate that cliche'} progressed in our hunting careers we began pulling heavier and heavier bows. In my 30's I hunted with 80 pounds. Now WE are the aging generation. At 53, my body reminds me every day of the folly of my youth and 80 pound longbows, preferring low to mid 50 pounders. Look around you. The average age of contributors here and the other sites is getting older. At 3-D shoots the average age must be 40 +, particularly at the Trad events.
  The more I think about it,I definatly think age is a factor. Get the next generation to abandon their X-Box's and MP3 players, get them into the woods in mass and you will see an increase in the average poundage again.

John
Who ever called this the "Golden Years" never lived this long...

Offline Cherokee Scout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1849
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #13 on: November 16, 2008, 08:37:00 AM »
I can say that in the 7 years we have been selling bows, they desired weight has gone down every year. Best selling bows now seem to be in the 40s. It is getting hard to sell bows over 55 lb. Bows of 60 or more hang on the rack forever.
I think that carbon arrows have contributed to this too. Experts say that if you switch to carbons from aluminum or woods, you can drop 10 lbs in bow weight and get equal or better penetration. They say the absence of the noodle action of carbon makes them far more efficient.
John

Offline George D. Stout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3467
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #14 on: November 16, 2008, 09:53:00 AM »
As one who was there, I can offer this information:  At Bear Archery....anything over 55 pounds was Special Order.    At my archery club, the guy shooting the really heavy bow had a 57# Ben Pearson...which he only drew to about 26";  he drew his target bow to 28".  I use a 49 pound bow for years and shot through most of my game.   The most popular hunting weight from Bear, Ben Pearson and Wing was 45#.  Take it for what it's worth.  The compound brought the heavy bow concept mostly since the let off allowed it more easily.  And yes....there were a few who shot heavy bows, but as a percentage they were quite small.

Also you guys who read about the 200 pound bows of the Olde English Archers.  A great amount of those bows were recovered on the Mary Rose when it was raised.  Saxton Pope made exact copies of a few of them and the heaviest he could get was around 80 pounds.  Seems that the weights always get heavier as the tale is told.  Not surprising.

Offline Daddy Bear

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 387
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #15 on: November 16, 2008, 10:34:00 AM »
Starting with Saxton Pope who made exact copies of an English longbow recovered from the war ship "The Mary Rose", and then through many great hunting archers who followed, hunting bows of heavier weights than you describe were normal and ran a common theme tracing back to their traditional archery roots. This debate was openly discussed in publications by both target archers and hunting archers going back many generations. I for one have hunted with 65pound longbows going back for decades based upon the writings and teachings of the original old time hunting archers who got this thing going in our country, such as Pope. I for one think 65pounds is near middle of the road for my hunting longbows and I think there is enough written documentation by the fathers of traditional hunting archery to support this. It is abundantly clear by the written record that many who took the path of target archery reached different destinations than those who took the path of hunting archery. One destination does not negate the other. Where this path lead some in 1968 does not negate the path rediscovered by Pope with his recreation of the Mary Rose bow. It does not negate the path taken by Young, Imler, Bear, Hill, or the many other legends in archery. People were not in agreement then and are not in agreement now, but the facts exist:

"Of all the bows of the days when archery was in flower, only two
remain. These are unfinished staves found in the ship _Mary Rose_, sunk
off the coast of Albion in 1545. This vessel having been raised from
the bottom of the ocean in 1841, the staves were recovered and are now
in the Tower of London. They are six feet, four and three-quarters
inches long, one and one-half inches across the handle, one and one-
quarter inches thick, and proportionately large throughout. The
dimensions are recorded in Badminton. Of course, they never have been
tested for strength, but it has been estimated at 100 pounds.

Determined to duplicate these old bows, I selected a very fine grained
stave of seasoned yew and made an exact duplicate, according to the
recorded measurements.

This bow, when drawn the standard arrow length of twenty-eight inches,
weighed sixty-five pounds and shot a light flight arrow two hundred and
twenty-five yards."

-Saxton Pope

"The following is a partial list of those weighed and shot. They are, of
course, all genuine bows and represent the strongest.

Weight     Distance Shot
    Alaskan....................... 80 pounds    180 yards
    Apache........................ 28  "        120  "
    Blackfoot..................... 45  "        145  "
    Cheyenne...................... 65  "        156  "
    Cree.......................... 38  "        150  "
    Esquimaux..................... 80  "        200  "
    Hupa.......................... 40  "        148  "
    Luiseno....................... 48  "        125  "
    Navajo........................ 45  "        150  "
    Mojave........................ 40  "        110  "
    Osage......................... 40  "         92  "
    Sioux......................... 45  "        165  "
    Tomawata...................... 40  "        148  "
    Yurok......................... 30  "        140  "
    Yukon......................... 60  "        125  "
    Yaki.......................... 70  "        210  "
    Yana.......................... 48  "        205  "

The list of foreign bows is as follows:

                                   Weight     Distance Shot
    Paraguay...................... 60 pounds    170 yards
    Polynesian.................... 49  "        172  "
    Nigrito....................... 56  "        176  "
    Andaman Islands................45  "        142  "
    Japanese.......................48  "        175  "
    Africa.........................54  "        107  "
    Tartar.........................98  "        175  "
    South American.................50  "         98  "
    Igorrote.......................26  "        100  "
    Solomon Islands................56  "        148  "
    English target bow (imported)..48  "        220  "
    English yew flight bow.........65  "        300  "
    Old English hunting bow........75  "        250  "

- Saxton Pope

"Our hunting bows are from five feet six
inches to five feet eight inches in length. The weight of a hunting bow
should be from fifty to eighty pounds. One should start shooting with a
bow not over fifty pounds, and preferably under that. At the end of a
season's shooting he can command a bow of sixty pounds if he is a
strong man. Our average bows pull seventy-five pounds. Though it is
possible for some of us to shoot an eighty-five pound bow, such a
weapon is not under proper control for constant use."

-Saxton Pope

USE HEAVY BOWS by Tom Imler, Jr.
published in Ye Sylvan Archer 1942:

 http://members.tripod.com/~tmuss/shotfrompast/imler.htm

Hunting Arrows by Fred Bear
published in Ye Sylvan Archer 1943:

 http://members.tripod.com/~tmuss/shotfrompast/bear.htm

Art Young:

Young made all of his equipment: Osage longbows pulling 75 to 85 pounds, heavy birch arrows with homemade broadheads, and handtooled leather accessories.

 http://members.tripod.com/~tmuss/shotfrompast/young.html

Offline Holm-Made

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1505
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #16 on: November 16, 2008, 01:04:00 PM »
At least 80% of the bows I sell are between 45-51#.  I think this has a lot to do with the fact that 90% of my customers are middle age or older.  Younger shooters under 30 years old just are not buying many stick bows.  

10 years ago I would say the average weight people were shooting was 53-60# now it is 8-10 pounds less.  This is what I'm seeing in the upper midwest anyway.  Chad

Offline John McCreary

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 200
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #17 on: November 17, 2008, 02:54:00 AM »
Chad, do you think this speaks of the state of archery in general and Traditional arhery in particular? Our numbers are comprised by an aging demographic. Without an influx of younger archers and hunters our's is a dying venture, destined to go the way of shuffle board and white loafers...into obscurity.

John
Who ever called this the "Golden Years" never lived this long...

Offline Soilarch

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 591
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2008, 07:14:00 AM »
I think archery is very safe from obscurity...but traditional archery doesn't hold the appeal to a lot of people my age.  Seems you've 3 groups in my generation and in my area.  Dedicated Waterfowlers (shotguns, pumps and autos to be exact), Deer chasers (muzzleloaders and shotguns) and then the guys who are just all around hunters.  I know very few of the all-around hunters who don't bowhunt.  I only know one other my age who has ever shot a non-wheeled bow.  I actually think he went to all-wheeled a year or two ago.  Hopefully this summer I can get him back into it.  Most likely he couldn't ever get things tuned right and got frustrated after 4 or 5 years of no improvement.

I'd say give it time.  The generation before had to choose to LEAVE traditional archery.  My generation is going to have to choose to JOIN traditional archery...I think you'll see guys move towards as they get older.


Oh, P.S.  Break those white loafers out...the prettyboys are all over the retro stuff right now.  You'd be in the height of fashion.  AND if there was a place to play shuffleboard on campus I guarantee it be at least as busy as the bowling alley!!!
Micah 6:8

Offline myshootinstinks

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 616
Re: Average draw weight, 1968 compare 2008
« Reply #19 on: November 17, 2008, 08:26:00 AM »
Having given it some thought, In recent years I've met just one strictly Traditional Archer under 50. There are a few others that own a recurve but they primarily use compounds.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©