3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Spine...Is it really true?  (Read 401 times)

Offline Robert Honaker

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 750
Spine...Is it really true?
« on: November 20, 2008, 06:44:00 PM »
All I have ever read about, or heard about trad bows ,is that they require weak spined arrows.
I understand that the Easton chart is way off from my own experience, but from what I gather from this site and the other is that people are shooting WAY weaker spines than me. All of my bows are about the same [email protected] draw to 29.5 with a 30in arrow. Most of what I see recommended are 2020,2117 or 400 ...500 spine carbon. I have cut, widdled and played with point weight to madness and always end up with 2216/125gr BH or .350 carbon /250grBH. 400 carbons will work with 85-100gr BH...WAY TOO LIGHT.
If I said I was shootin 2216's with a 125gr BH most people would say I am way off!
I can shoot 2219's with a 175 tip, but don't make me do it, agonizingly slow.
Is all this normal or am I listening to others too much?
Sorry bout the long post.
Thanks

Offline Danny Rowan

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 4343
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2008, 07:44:00 PM »
If it shoots well out of your bows, do not worry about what other people tell you. IMO for your bow 70/75 spine in a wood arrow would be about right with 125-145 up front. What ever you shoot just tune the arrow to your bow and you will be fine.

Danny
"When shooting instinctivly,it matters not which eye is dominant"

Jay Kidwell and Glenn St. Charles

TGMM Family Of The Bow
NRA Life/Patron member
NAHC life member
Retired CPO US Navy 1972-1993
Retired USCBP Supervisory Officer 1999-2017

Offline Robert Honaker

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 750
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2008, 07:52:00 PM »
See, you underspined me again Danny.LOL.
Ilooked at kelly's chart and it states a 80/85 spine.
I have always wnated to shoot wood, but I'm afraid to buy any cause I know it would mean a month and several purchases to get it right.  :knothead:

Offline R H Clark

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1089
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2008, 07:58:00 PM »
The degree of cut to or past center will make a lot of difference.Also your longer draw accounts for more spine.

Offline O.L. Adcock

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 823
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2008, 08:49:00 PM »
"The degree of cut to or past center will make a lot of difference.Also your longer draw accounts for more spine."

Yep, plus many don't know what good tuning "is" and say they are well tuned when they are not....O.L.
---Six NAA/FITA National and World flight records.----

Offline Outwest

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 663
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2008, 09:06:00 PM »
My setups are about the same as yours and I shoot 2216 and 2117. They fly really well.

John

Offline JRY309

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4383
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2008, 09:24:00 PM »
I think most charts are just guidelines they are not carved in stone and there are alot of variables in trad bows and individual shooters.

Offline Robert Honaker

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 750
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2008, 09:27:00 PM »
I think I'm well tuned.
I have used the bareshaft method as well as the FP to BH method. I also use the " does it fly straight and hit where I'm looking" method.
If it doesn't fly straight and true I won't hunt with it. I've been killin' a bunch of deer, that must mean somethin'.
But I must say that I always think there's room for improvement. I can never stop tinkerin.
  :rolleyes:

Offline O.L. Adcock

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 823
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2008, 11:18:00 PM »
Robert, Didn't mean you were not tuned, just a general observation. You like to tinker? Increase the thickness of your side plate 1/16" or so and retune and see what spine/size it likes. For any given bow you can tune it a good plus or minus 10 pounds or more in spine if you are willing to do what it takes to do so. At 30" a 60# bow tuned to shoot 70-75# arrows will be more forgiving to our errors then the same bow tuned to shoot 80+. What arrows we shoot are our choice, the charts are just a middle ground starting point.....O.L.
---Six NAA/FITA National and World flight records.----

Offline Shawn Leonard

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 7837
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2008, 11:26:00 PM »
I have to agree with OL. I attend some shoots and have a big hunt I host each year with upwards of 70 people and it is shameful to see what most people call good arrow flight.  I shoot carbons mostly and all I need to tune most any spine of them to my 50-55# bows is different point weights. I do not kow what ya mean by needing a light spine for the arrow to tune well. I do know that i like my bareshafts to spine ever so weak cause when i add feathers and a broadhead it acts to stiffen them ever so slightly, Shawn
Shawn

Offline Robert Honaker

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 750
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #10 on: November 21, 2008, 03:05:00 PM »
O.L., no offense taken.
Are you saying that a bow that isn't cut to center is easier to tune? Or is it more forgiving  if it's tuned?

Offline SCATTERSHOT

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #11 on: November 21, 2008, 04:57:00 PM »
2216 and 2117 are about the same spine (83# vs. 81#). If they fly well for you, from your bow, then you are there. Don't worry about the spine charts.
"Experience is a series of non - fatal mistakes."

Offline O.L. Adcock

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 823
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #12 on: November 21, 2008, 06:17:00 PM »
Not any easier to tune, just more forgiving when done. The kicker with Scattershot's 2216 and 2117's being so close in spine, the 2216 is 1/64" further from center so they won't behave the same...O.L.
---Six NAA/FITA National and World flight records.----

Offline Lewis Brookshire III

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1213
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2008, 07:00:00 PM »
Why exactley would a tuned bow not cut to center be more forgiving than a tuned bow that is cut past center??
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose."
- Jim Elliot: Missionary/Martyr.

Offline SCATTERSHOT

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2008, 07:14:00 PM »
Not to pick nits, but wouldn't 1/2 of 1/64" be 1/128"? I sure can't shoot well enough to pick up the difference! LOL!
"Experience is a series of non - fatal mistakes."

Offline O.L. Adcock

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 823
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #15 on: November 21, 2008, 09:03:00 PM »
Scattershot, Have you ever shot a bow with a plunger button? 1/4 turn on those things makes a big difference in arrow flight and that's way less then 1/64". The "22" and "21" part of 2216 and 2117 is the diameter in 64ths. Unless you use a thinner side plate that's how far you moved the arrow centerline.

Lewis, the closer to centershot a bow is, the stiffer spine the bow needs, the stiffer the spine the less it bends, the less it bends the lower the clearance from the bow. Our screw ups more easily cause arrow contact. Being cut past center is a good thing only from the standpoint it gives you more options to adjust it in or out, that doesn't mean it should be shot that way. Even Olympic target archers do not shoot their bows "centershot"....O.L.
---Six NAA/FITA National and World flight records.----

Offline Greg Owen

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 545
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #16 on: November 21, 2008, 09:32:00 PM »
O.L.,

I think what Scattershot is saying is that the 1/64th difference is in diameter. So the radius is only 1/128th different - meaning the arrow would be out 1/128th of an inch further on the 2216. The other 1/128th is on the side of the arrow away from the bow
Greg  >>>>>--------------->
A Traditional Archer and Vegetarian.

Offline O.L. Adcock

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 823
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #17 on: November 21, 2008, 09:40:00 PM »
Greg, Ok, I see what he's saying, it's still noticeable no matter what it is.  :) ...O.L.
---Six NAA/FITA National and World flight records.----

Offline Lewis Brookshire III

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1213
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #18 on: November 22, 2008, 07:49:00 AM »
Ok, that makes sense. I have never had a bow cut past center and I always assumed it would be better. I didnt know Oly archers didnt use the passed center option...interesting.
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose."
- Jim Elliot: Missionary/Martyr.

Offline Doc Nock

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 9234
Re: Spine...Is it really true?
« Reply #19 on: November 22, 2008, 11:28:00 AM »
I'll chime in here...I bugged po' OL to death years back trying to get the BS tuning method to work... nobody could believe for the low draw weight, the spine weight I was needing.

I was shooting a Morrison (still am) that is cut according to Bob, 3/16 PAST center. I thought that was superior!

This year, striving for EFOC, I couldn't get a high FOC and still spine right... then OL made a comment I think is perfect...

(paraphrased)"...when you have a riser cut to center or past, the arrow comes off the string and doesn't know which way to paradox..."  :)

That made perfect sense to me. (OL knows by now he has to "stupid up" stuff to get me to understand!)  :)  

85% of my shots fly true to form...15% will sometimes show some small barrel roll (my term)but hit with the others perfectly.  Especially when I reduced the fletching size to quiet the arrow. I don't like losing energy to poor flight!

When it warms, I'm into sticking some side plate shims behind my seal skin and see what it does. Might even allow me to get my FOC up to EFOC standards!
The words "Child" and "terminal illness" should never share the same sentence! Those who care-do, others question!

TGMM Family of the Bow

Sasquatch LB

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©