okay... i'll respond to this as i see fit... I am co-chair of the AK chapter along with Mark Richards.
i don't know what is considered a "hippie liberal" stance on predator control, i guess i'd be interested to find out.
I believe it is right and proper to question the motives and manner of predator control, and before predator control is brought into play, we need to separate "need" from "want".
There is a move up here to shoot black bears in a unit where the public justification is that the locals need meat,and can't find enough moose... but regulations are being pushed to allow the wanton waste of perfectly edible spring bear by repealing salvage requirements. How does that make hunters look?
I object to this, and I object to the push from a private organization to allow the use of helicopters for this same "hunt".
Right now AK BHA is trying very hard to find a way to get proper funding for our Dept of Fish and Game, where we are embarrassingly underfunded when it comes to doing basic population studies on moose, sheep, goat, and bears.
Is this "hippie liberal" stuff?
We want harvestable, healthy natural populations of all game and non-game animals, not just high profile critters like moose and sheep, but predators, songbirds, and everything that comes together to make Alaska unique.