3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?  (Read 388 times)

Offline NW Jamie

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?
« on: February 19, 2009, 05:10:00 PM »
Ok, thinking that I had arrows figured out based on knowing that the first two digits denoted diameter and then understanding the last two for wall thickness I was set. Also spent time testing how the 2018 that I was shooting acted, as well as reading all the info here for those of us that are slow learners LOL. When you look at the spine values that Easton puts out the confusion comes back! The 2018 that I shoot has a 0.464 spine factor, so I was going to go down, making the assumption of being somewhat over spined; but if I go down to a 2016 it has a 0.531 spine and a 2114 has a 0.510 spine. Is not the Higher the number the heavier spine?
Regard’s,
Jim

Offline hormoan

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2056
Re: Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2009, 05:17:00 PM »
0.464 is stiffer than 0.531 those numbers are the deflection in thousand's of an inch. Hope that clears it up for you   :thumbsup:

Offline NW Jamie

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Re: Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2009, 05:40:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by hormoan:
0.464 is stiffer than 0.531 those numbers are the deflection in thousand's of an inch. Hope that clears it up for you    :thumbsup:  
Oh, thats it, now it does make sense, thnak you.
Regard’s,
Jim

Offline Old York

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 577
Re: Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2009, 06:00:00 PM »
Jamie, if a shaft had 0.000" deflection it would be 100% stiff. Just a way I keep it straight   ;)
"We were arguing about brace-height tuning and then a fistmele broke out"

Offline dragonheart

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3593
Re: Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2009, 06:04:00 PM »
Jamie,
The higher the spine deflection number the weaker the arrow.  Has nothing to do with arrow size marked on the aluminum.
Longbows & Short Shots

Offline Tree man

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 428
Re: Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2009, 06:34:00 PM »
Easton uses their own standard --1.94 pound and 28inch spacing on the supports. But the old standard is easy. 26 inch spacing of shaft supports, 2 pound weight. Divide 26  by deflection = spine rating  in pounds  for a 28 (YES 28!) inch arrow.

Offline R H Clark

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1089
Re: Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2009, 08:42:00 PM »
Yes it's a 1.94# weight between 28" centers.It is measured in thousandths of an inch.The higher the number the weaker the shaft.A .400 will be 10# stiffer than a .500 shaft.

Online sagebrush

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 733
Re: Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2009, 10:27:00 PM »
Sorry R.H. that doesn't correlate with the charts. .10 (the difference from .400 to .500) does not equal 10#
A 2020 spine tests at 77 lbs. .426 deflection.
A 2016 spine tests at 61 lbs. .531 deflection.
I guess you could round it up to that but in my experience a 5# spine difference does make a difference. Gary

Online sagebrush

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 733
Re: Spine; is 0.464 heavier than 0.531?
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2009, 10:57:00 PM »
There are some charts you can see at Easton Archery and Foxfire archery that will show you the different spines and deflections of aluminums. Gary

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©