Indeed, Kentuk, someone should. I left aluminums and modular broadheads behind years ago in favor of woodies and fixed 2-blades. And I never even considered carbons. Only recently did I open the old closed mind to experimentation with both, thanks to Doc Ashby's tenacious and convincing work (once we quit arguing against it and actually give it a try for ourselves). When I tried to buy brass or steel inserts for a single 2413 alum shaft I bought to cut into pieces to experimentally sleeve the fronts of some woodies (for added strength, weight, and the option to use screw-in heads), the salesman chuckled and said none such were available. I figured they probably are available, just not at this local-yokel wheelie-bow shop. But if you say not, I'm sure you're more experienced in contemporary aluminums than I am, so there it is. But again, I agree we need brass and/or steel inserts for alum as well as carbon shafts. For two good reasons: aluminum (or, for Ozzie Clint and our other Brit friends, "al-U-min-e-um") inserts are weak and often fail, and, the more weight up front, the better for accuracy (up to a logical point, of course) and definitely for penetration. The carbon industry is way ahead on this. Brass or steel, or both is the only way to go for hardware. Right now as never before in my lifetime, there are market opportunities that will not only make a living for a few enterprising folk, but better bowhunting by making us more effective killers. dave