The weight versus speed argument has had me scratching my head for decades. I shoot a longbow now; and getting the 'proper' arrow was and is a task.
When I shot a recurve; which was for a couple decades; I remember the chronographs showing up where you could figure speed; and its been off to the races ever since.
I made a game of asking people if my arrow was good for hunting. I shot 31 inches of 2216 shaft; and I would say 'its a 45 pound bow' and people said 'oh yeah thats a fine arrow'; then with the same bow I would ask another person if the arrow was OK for hunting and say it was a '50 pound bow'; and some would shake their heads and say 'no'; and others yes.
Then I got up to the weight at my draw; about 74 pounds; and not one person said that arrow was OK for hunting.
Now I had killed deer and bear and elk with it; having total penetration in most cases; and having a flat trajectory.
If an arrow shoots perfectly straight out of a 45 pound bow; and out of a 74 pound bow - how can the arrow be not appropriate for the 74 pound bow- but 'great' for the 45?
Then too penetration on animals depends not only on shot placement; but if its a two blade; 3 blade; 4 blade etc. And on being sharp enough.
I guess its all good fun... but shooting an arrow accurately and straight (no wobbling or porpoising) -well... that works for bowhunting.
I am now kind of chuckling over the nock weighting systems to make the arrow heavier in the nock end.
All good fun I guess