"Trouble...what trouble?" Jeremiah Johnson.
I don't see that traditional equipment is harder. It does take practice, but what's hard about that? I consider that fun. To be honest, I've only taken maybe a dozen shots with a compound bow. That was enough for me to decide that longbows and recurves are what works best for me. I don't have a problem with compound shooters who use them ethically, which I think (hope) is the majority. Compounds have more in common with guns than traditional bows (sights, triggers, etc.). I don't need or want that on my bow, but that is my choice.
Mo. Huntin if you have NEVER had something go wrong with your compound, then you are a lucky man. Compounds are machines by definition (okay, so are longbows and recurves...just fewer parts), and whether the machine is a compound bow, a firearm, or an automobile, things wear, break, or need adjustment. You decrease the chances of a problem through proper maintenance, but you can't eliminate it. I have less to do to maintain my longbow (wax the string occasionally and check brace height). If I do have a string break, I can be shooting again in the field, with no tools, in a minute or so (assuming I brought a spare).
I also don't have to carry a range finder (never owned one), nor to I have to remember what pin goes with what yardage. If it looks like it is too far, it is, so I don't shoot (even if it really isn't).
So, maintenance with a longbow...easier.
Carrying a longbow...much easier.
Extra equipment needed...none.
Practice needed...fun.
Woodsmanship needed...same.
What is the hard part?