Hmm. I'm probably not worthy of an "old school" label amongst the ranks here(likely due to my current interest in the Ashby philosophy, hehe)however... I do consider myself to be so, now that I think about it.
Even though the Grizzlystik and single bevel combo has my interest the remainder of my equipment and methods show a distinct LACK of "new and improved". The hunting members of my family think I'm some kind of throw back from the dark ages and belong in a cave. ROFL.
EVEN the EFOC and single bevel head is viewed by them as "old".
However, besides the above, my equipment is from the 60s, including and not limited to wood and fiberglass arrows, mid 60s Super Kodiaks, Bear and Herters heads etc.
Probably more noticable to my family is what is LACKING in that area (to them).
Those NOT included are:
Tree stands *except on a RARE occasion*
Cover scents or scent blockers
Attractants
Calls of any kind
Man made blinds
Wind direction indicators
Spotting scope
Binoculars (unless scouting)
Lighted nocks
half the time, no camo but do tend to want something over my ugly white face and shiney bow limbs.
I'm NOT saying using any of the above is wrong OR makes anyone less "old school", should that be a goal. As an example there were cover scents used clear back to "Injun" days, but they are just not for me. Downwind is downwind.
For me, bowhunting is the challange of me against the animal. Again, FOR ME, using things like my nephew's do to "increase their odds", also reduces the satisfaction I get from it all. I also want to add that for ME, that stuff is all a PIA and I'd rather spend the money on broadheads that cost too much. *grin*
I'm more like the young man busting his chops a few years to save up for a 10 year old car rather the professional business man who buys a new Caddy every two years.
Mine might not be as nice TO OTHERS, but I know what it took to get it and my appreciation and pride in what I am able to get takes second seat to no one.
The "new wave" bowhunting, or hunting by ANY method, seems (TO ME, NO OFFENSE TO ANYONE) to be geared towards "take all the advantages you can and measure your success in inches of antler".
This trend actually DROVE me away from it. Too much of the HUNT was removed or at least reduced and it seems (to ME) to be more competiton oriented BETWEEN HUNTERS than between the hunter and the hunted.
Oh yeah, a huge, big, large, jumbo, heavy massed, high tined beastie is in the top of my bucket list, FOR SURE!!!!!
Should that be in the cards, I'll take him one on one, eyeball to eyeball, coming in downwind and connecting with a well placed shot at close range.
That said, taking a "smaller" one the same way is just too far up that same list to start "cutting corners" on how I WANT to do it all.
Take your enjoyment from our sport as you see fit. No true hunter will downgrade any legal methods, but forgive me if I think that taking too many short cuts is only removing some of the challenge and THEREFORE some of your own satisfaction.
Bowhunting and Challenging have been words used together all my life. I may not connect repeatedly on the "class" of whitetail others do, but THEIR success has no direct connection nor will it be used to measure my own.
Somehow, I think THAT single thought makes me "old school".
Pardon my wordy reply. I got up too early. I need coffee. LOL
God Bless!