Jeremy and David have the right answer. A Force/Draw curve is shaped roughly like a triangle. 50# @ 30" has more area under the curve than 50# @ 28". Simple to calculate, indisputable, and unavoidable.
Two bows of precisely the same design (excluding extremely short bows), with one being drawn to 30" and the other being drawn to 28", will almost always exhibit the same characteristic - the longer draw stores more energy PER POUND OF DRAW than the shorter draw. It doesn't matter if we're comparing 24" versus 26" or 28" versus 30". The relationship holds true. Longer draws at X pounds store more energy than shorter draws at X pounds. Don't make the mistake of comparing X pounds at 30" and Y pounds at 28". That's not a valid comparison.
An example: Joe, who draws his brand X bow rated 50# @ 30" stores more energy (PER POUND OF DRAW) than Sam who draws his similar brand X bow that's rated 50# @ 28". Therefore, Joe will shoot the same exact arrow (precisely XYZ grains per pound of draw weight) faster than Sam because his brand X bow is imparting more stored energy into the arrow than Sam's - even though both Joe and Sam are pulling the same draw weight. More stored energy PER POUND OF DRAW means more energy goes into the arrow for a longer draw length.
Longer draw lengths in bows designed to utilize and benefit from longer draws are always advantaged versus shorter draws.
However, many bows are very short because that's what some people want. Very short bows are AS A GENERAL RULE (emphasis on GENERALIZING HERE) less efficient at storing energy than longer bows. So a short bow may very well yield less benefit to the longer draw because it's stacking and therefore not storing as much energy per pound of draw over those last couple of inches of draw. If you can find a short bow that stores as much energy per pound of draw as a much longer one it would be the absolute schnizzle. When/if you find such a bow you will have found the result of much hard, miserable, low-paying, and sub-economic-return bowyer design work.