Long shots are just insecurity.
This fall I watched a 6x6 bull elk for 20 minutes that was broadside, but beyond my comfort zone for a clean kill. While trading hunting stories later with some friends who hunt with compounds one of them said "either one of us (pointing to his buddy) would have been able to take that bull..."
As if animals won't jump the string on compounds too.
It was really a revelation to me. I had never dissed compounds and was pretty surprised that in that one statement one-upmanship become part of our relationship, because I hunt trad and they hunt compound and someone has a problem with that difference.
Let me say this: letting what others "would have done" get under your skin will ruin the sport (any sport) for you. As mentioned by others enjoy the sport for yourself, on your terms. Don't measure its worth against equipment made for those who wouldn't dare give up pin sights, releases and super fast arrow flight in attempting to take game, or against shots that are really too far to be ethical, even if they sometimes are successful.
It is a remarkable thing that you hunt with equipment that even with carbon arrows requires you to become one with it and intuitive. It requires you to get closer to remain ethical.
Long shots are for gamblers, not good hunters. A lot can happen between the time an arrow is released and when it makes its target. The target only needs to step forward 12 inches and the shot is marginal or crippling.
There is no shame in being ethical.
Joshua