To me it depends on where I am hunting and the population of deer and perceived buck/doe ratio. In Columbia County I just shot one of each with the longbow. I had a good solid 8 pt (maybe 100") moving into range and since he wasn't a trophy deer I passed him up and shot a spike that had one long spike and then a short unattached spike. I just thought letting the bigger buck go to breed the many does made better sense. The spike was shot for meat and because I didn't believe he would add much to the local gene pool. 10 minutes after shooting the spike I shot a mature doe because the area seems to have loads of them. In Indiana I would have done things a bit different and definately passed the spike due to the one buck rule. Lots of factors come into play for me to make a personal decision. Being out of meat, days left before the guns start blazing, possible future hunt opportunities, etc. The bottom line for me is that it really just depends. I think most people make choices based on their personal reasons. That's the way it should be! If they choose to shoot a doe, fawn, spike, or Booner then good for them! It ain't a contest!