3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Ultra Cam Skinny?  (Read 1044 times)

Offline vermonster13

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 14572
Re: Ultra Cam Skinny?
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2009, 11:13:00 AM »
I don't pad them Gil. I use Halo .19 to serve the loops and haven't had any trouble.
TGMM Family of the Bow
For hunting to have a future, we must invest ourselves in future hunters.

Offline freefeet

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 381
Re: Ultra Cam Skinny?
« Reply #21 on: November 22, 2009, 01:53:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by LC:
I first used D97 and it just kept creeping. I've also read lots of follks say D97 hasn't done that. I'm wondering if change of manufacture, quality control or string maker is the difference.
Quote
Originally posted by LC:
I make endless loops myself, have so for years, It's always been my opinion that endless have alot less chance of creeping than flemish simply because of the number of twists.
Haven't you answered your own question?

   :D
Shoes are a tax on walking...

...free your feet, your mind will follow!

Offline pebowbender

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Ultra Cam Skinny?
« Reply #22 on: November 22, 2009, 03:50:00 PM »
My first skinny, I used the same Brownell FF I have been using for probably 10 years. I used 12 strands and padded the loops and serving area to 16 strands. After the initial shoot-in(maybe 100 arrows or so) the string hasn't crept at all. I chrono'ed the 12 strand and the 16 strander I have been making all these years and there wasn't ANY difference in speed. The skinny did need 25gr less of tip wt to tune though and even with 1/2 as much string silencer material(I use yarn), the 12 strander was much quieter. Can't wait to get the UC and make a comparison.

Offline pebowbender

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Ultra Cam Skinny?
« Reply #23 on: November 25, 2009, 11:28:00 AM »
Made my first UC string yesturday(8 strands). Seems to be good(haven't shot it enough to make a determination). Will shoot it more today. It is quiet but does seem to be less forgiving of brace height. Had to raise the brace by a full 1/4". Anyone else have this problem?

Offline BenBow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4690
Re: Ultra Cam Skinny?
« Reply #24 on: November 25, 2009, 03:01:00 PM »
Why did you have to raise the brace height, sound or tuning? If it's tuning raising the brace height is used to stiffen the dynamic spine. Could be like pebowbender you may need to lighten the point weight because the bow is more efficient.
But his bow will remain steady, and his hands will be skillful; because of the hands of the Mighty One of Jacob, because of the Shepherd, the Rock of Israel,  (Genesis 49:24 [NETfree])

Offline pebowbender

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Ultra Cam Skinny?
« Reply #25 on: November 26, 2009, 09:23:00 AM »
I had to raise the brace height because the bow was loud and had increased hand shock. Adding 1/4" of brace height cleared that up.

Offline BenBow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4690
Re: Ultra Cam Skinny?
« Reply #26 on: November 26, 2009, 11:05:00 AM »
Interesting. Did you try going lower than your original height? Mine works well lower than higher.
But his bow will remain steady, and his hands will be skillful; because of the hands of the Mighty One of Jacob, because of the Shepherd, the Rock of Israel,  (Genesis 49:24 [NETfree])

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©