Originally posted by George D. Stout:
... Well it really is a simple sport, we just complicate it with a bunch of extraneous crap that doesn't mean much in a real brick fight. You need a bow, a string, and some arrows...that's about it. Problem is we have myriad experts now just waiting to tell you how much you have to fiddle with your stuff, from bareshafting to front-loading. Those guys can take the fun out of the sport in a hurry if you allow it. Some of us old guys know better and do what we have done for decades. And, we have never been deprived of killing game or shooting great scores because we were out of touch with the genius contingency. 8^).
i hear your point, george, and revel in its simplistic merit.
however, i'll take the opposite tack that toots the horn of logical reasoning as to why it can be a very good thing not to just to just have 'a bow, a string, and some arrows'.
to whit, a few examples ...
* there are extraordinary efficiencies gained by tuning arrows to fly well out of a given bow, for both accuracy and game killing.
* there are distinct advantages in testing out bowstring fibers and strand counts, for consistency, accuracy and less noise.
* there are voluminous, well documented reasons why front end arrow loading is a bowhunter/archer's best friend.
whether i like it or not, i'm one of those old guys that started off with a lemonwood longbow, way back in the early 1950's. however, i consider myself smart enuf to employ sound reasoning and technology when and where it will increase my trad bowhunting/archery consistency and success - without compromising the 'simple stick 'n' string' focus and objective.
or, just go grab a bow, brace up and fling some arras.
to each their own and as always, ymmv.