3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?  (Read 668 times)

Offline Benny Nganabbarru

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 6549
Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« on: January 15, 2010, 07:05:00 PM »
As I am interested in shooting wooden arrows from heavy bows, I have experimented with front-loading. However, even with the stiffest Douglas fir, I am really at the limits with a mere 160 grains up-front. I shoot 83# @ 29" of Silvertip. The arrows I use weigh between 700 and 775 grains.

One of my favourite books is "Archer in Africa" by Bill Negley, who killed five elephants for certain (an additional mortally-stricken beast ran into a raging, flooded river, never to be seen again, and poor trackers lost the trail of another one) with Bear recurves. Here's a quote from it that got me wondering:

"I promptly tested the one-hundred-and-two-pounder and found it even more exciting than the ninety-pounder had been. One hundred pounds had a reassuring ring to it, and this one carried two extra pounds for good measure. This was like going through the sound barrier. All the articles by the archery editors and assorted sages that I had studied seemed to hint that new worlds began at one hundred pounds... This beautiful thing had a fresh, clean leather wrapping on the perfectly-formed grip, and on the broad surface just above the grip, in black india ink, an electric message: "To Bill Negley - Made especially to kill an elephant - Fred Bear." At this moment, the whole prospect seemed so much more reasonable than at any moment up to now... The arrows I had been using for months were a special development of Eastman, the leading manufacturer in the field. Eastman, employing heat and pressure, impregnated cedar shafts with a resin that gave them extra stiffness, toughness and weight. My arrows weighed over a thousand grains and were chronographed at over two hundred feet per second."

So, does anybody know how to do this to wooden shafts? Could this be done in the same way that dymondwood is made?

Penny for your thoughts,

Ben
TGMM - Family of the Bow

Offline Killdeer

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 9147
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2010, 07:23:00 PM »
I have no clue, but I really really want to read that book!

Killdeer   :scared:
Long, long afterward, in an oak I found the arrow, still unbroke;
And the song, from beginning to end, I found again in the heart of a friend.

~Longfellow

TGMM Family Of The Bow

Offline Tater

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 2409
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2010, 07:31:00 PM »
Ben,

      Dymondwood would be very close I would think, if you know any Custom knife makers they often send pieces of wood to be "stabilized" which is from what I know(which aint much) about the same as Dymondwood a process which under great pressure impregnates the wood with a resin.
  I would think it easier to have the shafts stabilized than try and work the Dymondwood?

                Pat
Compton Traditional Bowhunters Charter/Life Member
Big Thompson Bowhunters
United Bowhunters of Illinois
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline NY Yankee

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 531
  • Wooden Bows, Wooden Arrows and 2-Blade Broadheads
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2010, 07:32:00 PM »
It probably could be. Bet you wouldn't want to pay for a couple dozen though. Better off looking into maple, hickory, birch arrows etc. I hear 3/8" maple shafts are brutally heavy and stiff too.
"Elk don't know how many feet a horse has!"
Bear Claw Chris Lapp

Offline Ragnarok Forge

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3034
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2010, 07:35:00 PM »
Look at the hardwood shafting on the market. Plenty available and lots of it is really heavy.
Clay Walker
Skill is not born into anyone.  It is earned thru hard work and perseverance.

Offline Izzy

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 7487
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2010, 07:39:00 PM »
Ben, I have a strong suspicion that a lot of the old timers arrows came from mature trees unlike what we get these days.It seems like alot of old bear arrows that I have are lighter in mass weight but stiffer in spine than a lot of the new stuff I get my hands on.I dont know about resin but I remember an article in TBH where the author submerged his arrows in oil to get the weight up but I dont think it did much for spine.

Offline NDTerminator

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1181
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2010, 08:07:00 PM »
Over 1000 grains at better than 200FPS... Gawd!  :eek:
"As Trad as I wanna be"

"It's all just archery, and all archery is good"

Online Lucas K

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 631
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2010, 08:11:00 PM »
I remember reading this as well. I am intrigued as I have never heard anything about Eastman Archery. Does anyone have any of these arrows?

Lucas
Lucas Kent

Offline bawana bowman

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1327
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2010, 08:11:00 PM »
Ben,

What spine shafts are you shooting in the douglas fir?

I've got some 85-90 and 95-100 that I'm building for my 80# Monarch Imperial. Planned on going 250 to 300 up front with the 95-100 will let you know how they work.

Also have a 90# recurve I was going to try them with. Will give you results after testing.

Offline stringstretcher

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 2031
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2010, 08:35:00 PM »
Were these not the same arrows that Tink Nathan used in Africa?  If I am not wrong, I think they were Eastman Game getters with a wooden shaft drove un inside the entire length?
Genesis 27:3 Now therefore take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the field, and take me [some] venison

TGMM Family Of The Bow

Offline Archer Fanatic

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 196
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2010, 08:49:00 PM »
I don't know if this will help. I brought this video "A history of the Compressed Cedar Arrow" with Bill Sweetland.  Bill invented a way to shrink and add weight to cedar arrows and this video tells his story. This video was made by Archery Past  61562 East Lake Dr., Bend, Oregon 97702. Hope this is what you are looking for. Mike in Ohio

Offline Shaun

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3619
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2010, 09:06:00 PM »
Sweetlands were stabilized with formaldehyde which is tightly controlled now. Barrel smooth bark hickory shafts would be my choice to get this spine and weight.

Offline Benny Nganabbarru

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 6549
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2010, 09:08:00 PM »
Thanks, fellows; a lot to consider in your answers.

Harold, I use 30" 105/110# Douglas fir shafts, with 160 grains up-front. I also built-out my strike plate with a thicker piece of leather. This set-up works well, but they're just a whisker weak at close range before the feathers sort them out.

Mike, I'll look into that film, as it sounds interesting.
TGMM - Family of the Bow

Offline Benny Nganabbarru

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 6549
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #13 on: January 15, 2010, 09:09:00 PM »
Shaun, where would you get these shafts from?
TGMM - Family of the Bow

Offline Don Stokes

  • Tradbowhunter
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *
  • Posts: 2607
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2010, 09:29:00 PM »
The way we got the highest spines in the Superceder shafts was by making the diameter larger than normal then barrel tapering. We were able to make shafts from yellow poplar that way that spined 120# and more that were 25/64 in the center section and 11/32 on each end. Weights topped out in the 500-600 grain range for the raw shafts, but poplar is relatively light. With a heavier species like birch, maple, or hickory you could make really heavy, really strong shafts this way.

I visited Bill Sweetland in the '80's to learn his methods, and had a great time with him. He used heat and high pressure to compress POC boards, then used a lathe to mill the shafts. His boards were tapered, which gave him a parallel shaft that was heavier on the point end. I did some experimenting with similar methods using yellow poplar treated with stabilizing chemicals and made some really heavy shafts, with arrows weighing in the 900 grain range, but the process was too expensive to commercialize. That's why we used barrel tapering instead in the Superceder business.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.- Ben Franklin

Online Lucas K

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 631
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2010, 09:41:00 PM »
I am very familiar with Sweetland's process and shafts, but the book is specific and says the shafts were made by Eastman, whom until this quote I had never heard of... again are there any of these out there? Which Eastman was Mr Negley talking about? Where and how were these shafts made, thats what I would like to know...

Lucas
Lucas Kent

Offline Steve H.

  • SRBZ
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 1827
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2010, 09:56:00 PM »
BK:  How about trying purpleheart?  I have a couple I would spare for you, want me to hand deliver?!  Camels beware!

Online Orion

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8252
  • Contributing Member
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2010, 10:28:00 PM »
Was Negley talking about the same Eastman (sic) who manufactured and popularized aluminum arrows in this country?  Maybe the arrow(s) Negley used were aluminums filled with a wooden shaft, as someone already suggested.  Thought I read somewhere that Negley  used fiberglass shafts to kill at least one elephant.

The process he describes in your quote sure sounds like the Sweetland process, though.  It's possible the names got mixed up/substituted in publication.  In fact, the more I think about it, the more I think that is what happened.  Eastman (Easton) was a big name in the arrow/archery industry at the time.  So was Sweetland.  They sound rather similar don't they.  Not at all unusual to inadvertently switch the names, and an editor likely wouldn't know the difference.

I picked up some Sweetland forgewoods a while back that would almost fit the bill.   The raw shafts are 31 inches long, 11/32 with a 9-inch taper to 5/16.  The raw shafts weigh right around 740 grains.  Adding finish, feathers and a nock would bring them close to 800 grains.  Add a 160-200 grain point and they would be around 1,000 grains.  Of course, if they weren't tapered, they would weigh another 50 grains or so more.  Spine is well over 100#.  I don't know how much over, but it's way off my scale, which stops at 100#.

I plan to redowel them to 5/16 full length, maybe tapering to 9/32, or, depending on their weight and spine at those dimensions, maybe taking them to 9/32 full length. I'm thinking they'll still be in the 80# range and probably weigh 550-600 grains bare shaft, which fits my equipment better.

Offline Hud

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2233
  • 360-921-5779
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2010, 10:48:00 PM »
Eastman might be Easton Alu. (Doug Easton). Bill Sweetlands shaft making equipment was up for sale last year. I think the equipment was moved to Alaska and then put up for sale. There was a picture in TG of the 102 lb but it is no longer on Photobucket. You might try a Goo*** search. I thought he used a double shelve bow. It would have taken a much lighter spine than a new center shot. Another reference was made to a 1958 Kodiak.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Online Orion

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8252
  • Contributing Member
Re: Can we still make the same arrows as Bill Negley had?
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2010, 10:54:00 PM »
There's a thread on Negley in the Collector's forum that has a lot more information on the BOWS Negley used to take his elephants.  Jack Harrison and two other Alaskans bought Sweetland's equipment and moved it to Alaska several years back.  Unfortunately, their endeavor did not last long.  It's my understanding that they made some pretty good compressed shafts out of an Alaskan tree species, some kind of spruce, I think.  The business/equipment has been for sale for a couple of years.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©