I drove to an archery shop outside of Philadelphia to shoot with some friends that I hadn't seen in a while. Took a few of my bows along with me to run through the chronometer. Not very scientific results, as I didn't measure the draw weight or anything. I will list the bow specs, the arrow weight, the presumed draw weight and grains/pound as well as the fps. I did weigh the arrows and took the average weight and shot 6-8 arrow groups to get the average fps. All of the bows were as they would be hunted with, with the recurves having a small hush puppy and pair of super string leeches and the longbows having a small hush puppy. I assumed 3 pounds of increased draw weight per inch increase in draw length. I know, lots of flawed data, but it was only for fun.
Bow #1
Black Widow MAIII recurve 64" 65# @ 28"
8 strand 450+ string
710 grain arrow
draw length 29.5" expected draw weight 69.5#
GPP 10.2
FPS 181
Bow #2
Black widow MAIII recurve 60" 67# @ 27"
Black Widow string (D97 I think)
670 grain arrow
draw length 29.5" expected draw weight 74.5#
GPP 9.0
FPS 197
Bow #3
Leon Stewart Slammer r/d longbow 66" 71# @ 28"
8 strand 450+ string
715 grain arrow
draw length 29.5" expected draw weight 75.5#
GPP 9.5
FPS 187
Bow #4
RER vortex r/d longbow 62" 56# @ 28"
8 strand 450+ string
571 grain arrow
draw length 29.5" expected draw weight 60.5#
GPP 9.4
FPS 184
Bow #5
Red Wing Slim Line Pro Recurve 58" 45# @ 28"
6 strand 450+ string
530 grain arrow
draw length 29.5" expected draw weight 49.5#
GPP 10.7
FPS 172
Maybe someone will be able to normalize for a consistant GPP to see which bows are more efficient, but I think they are all pretty close given the GPP. Longbows a little more quiet though. All of the arrows were well tuned for the bows and the draw length was very consistant.
Lots of fun and alot more shooting after the chrono. Might not want to shoot tomorrow.