I would like some honest opinions on comparison as far as smoothness, speed, and other details. I am only interested in performance not beauty.
To quote Mr. Ken Beck from a phone conversation I had with him a year or three ago...
"There's not a nickle's worth of difference in the better bows on the market today."
I agree. I've owned two BW recurves, shot several others and some BW longbows. I don't own one now, nor to I plan to in the future. Not to say they aren't nice bows, they just aren't the bow for me.
I'm not into bells and whistles, and have never found a comfortable seat on the bandwagon. I used to think I just had to buy this or that bow because 'ol so-and-so shot one, or because it got a great review in a magazine, or because it always got great reviews on a message board...but after shooting a lot of bows and spending a lot of money, I learned something. There ain't no magic bow (or arrow, or string, or broadhead, or camo, etc.). The monkey holding it is what makes the difference.
Get a bow you are comfortable with, learn to tune it, learn to shoot, then practice. That will make more of a difference than anything else.
I understand asking for reviews, but that is an exercise in futility. The two best resources I know of for unbiased information are Blacky Schwartz's reviews (I think he has a website too?), and Pete Ward's site.
Even then, they do basic tests, not in-depth shooting like you would do if you owned the bow.
Asking on a web site is like asking what brand truck is best, or what flavor ice-cream. You'll get opinions--usually biased ones. It's just human nature. It's interesting, but nothing you'd want to bet the farm on. JMO.
Chad