Originally posted by Terry Green: QuoteOriginally posted by Steve H.: Can you get one so BIG that we can load photos straight to it instead of at photobucket etc? The problem with that Steve is that folks will also use it to store vacation, b'day, wedding pics etc....Not sure we would have a way to monitor that or not...least that's been Rob and my worries for years...let me chat with Rob about that. [/b]
Originally posted by Steve H.: Can you get one so BIG that we can load photos straight to it instead of at photobucket etc?
Originally posted by lt-m-grow: QuoteOriginally posted by Terry Green: QuoteOriginally posted by Steve H.: Can you get one so BIG that we can load photos straight to it instead of at photobucket etc? The problem with that Steve is that folks will also use it to store vacation, b'day, wedding pics etc....Not sure we would have a way to monitor that or not...least that's been Rob and my worries for years...let me chat with Rob about that. [/b]I understand the whole photobucket thing, but it is a pain. I would pay to use such a premium service! All I would want is to post pictures into the stories directly and not have to link them in through photobucket or the like. I truthfully don't post a lot of pictures because of that. I know that can be an argument to not offer it, but hey, everyone loves pictures.I am thinking no one wants to see me on the beach with my family on vacation :-) [/b]
Originally posted by Steve H.: Excellent T! I tried to lobby for this feature once or twice earlier but I don't think I got my point across what I was hoping for.Ease of use encourages participation, participation does the vendors good because it brings people back and keeps them here so I see this as a big win if you can get it done.As an example, to post one photos with a thread thru photobucket would take 5-10 minutes by the time I go logon, resize, get the IMG name, and get it into the text. I can do the same in about 20 seconds with direct photo posting.THANKS for looking into this feature!