Originally posted by Roger Norris 2:
I don't like the term "overrated" in this context....it neve makes sense to me to insult another fellows bow. Bows are very subjective, what one man shoots well with can be unuseable to another. ...
Not to mention some may not be tuned well. I have shot a couple of super respected bows considered top shelf and one had so much hand shock I thought it had been plugged in and set on "vibrate"
But I know that bow was not set up right. Even if I didn't like it, no way was it indicative of that makers design quality. The other bow (a Howard Jet) had serious top limb vibration after the shot and again either it was my form, or the bow was not tuned well for the arrows.
Unless we have really explored all ways a bow can be set up we can't really say they are over-rated, can we?
To go even further, I have my Dad's 1958 Yellowjacket longbow. I can shoot that bow well, but a lot of the time it has pretty good handshock. Yet sometimes, when I do my part form wise, there is none. Is the bow junk because my form sucks most of the time and I get handshock? Clearly if I "do it right' the bow will deliver an arrow as gracefuly as a swan.
It makes me wonder how many bows get moved along simply because we have not mastered them.
Joshua