Depends on what you're after -- a better chance of bagging a bird, or a more traditional and challenging hunt. Which is more fun and satisfying to you, win or lose? I personally don't like blinds for the same reason I don't like tree stands: just something else to buy and lug into and out of the woods and worry about getting stolen if you leave 'em there while you're gone. I hunt to simplify my life and escape from the material world. I like to travel light and fast, and can't count the times I've had birds close enough to reach out and grab, without a blind and without camo. (Although I still have some old camo jackets and pants I sometimes wear, all the stuff I've bought in recent years is dark plaid on top and dark green, brown, or black pants, and I've never had an elk, deer, antelope, or turkey notice the difference.) It's JUST more fun and challenging for me to try and arrange set-ups by thinking like a turkey (my wife would agree!)... which way is he most likely to come from, and where will he be looking? Where will he display and strut? (Gotta leave open room for that.) How will the terrain influence the direction my calls "sound" like they're coming from to an approaching bird, and thus, which side of the brush or downed tree should I sit on? Where should I place my decoy; or am I better off using no deke at all? But I hunt mountain forest country, which I realize is different from hunting flatlands, ag lands, etc. To each his own. No doubt blinds are more efficient in general. But so are shotguns. I'm far more in love with hunting turkeys than I am with killing and eating them, so I don't mind "losing" more than I win. We always learn more from losing than from winning with tech support. Good question you ask; good thinking process. Good luck to you. Dave