3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: theory-not working like i thought:)  (Read 257 times)

Offline bmb

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 427
theory-not working like i thought:)
« on: July 06, 2010, 10:24:00 AM »
so yesterday i decided to do a little test.. nothing real serious....i had just bought a brand new, never shot block 4x4 target. i took 3 arrows, arrow #1 is a beman ics 500 full length with a 150gr. head, total weight somewhere around 460grs., arrow #2 is a 27" 11/32 45-50 cedar with a 200 gr. head, total weight is 530grs....and arrow #3 is a 28" 2018 with a 150gr. head, total weight is a tad over 500grs.

so i shot each arrow 5 times and everytime the carbon won??!! the aluminium came in second everytime and the cedar was always last?

the bow i shot was my hoyt dorado at 45#( at the clicker)...so what do you guys think?

Offline 30coupe

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3114
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2010, 10:42:00 AM »
Do you mean the carbon penetrated farther? That's not surprising. The carbon is the smallest in diameter, which helps penetration. Were you shooting broadheads? If so, were they all the same? How far were you from the target? Carbon arrows recover quicker, so penetration is often better at close ranges compared to wood or aluminum. You could have lots of variables going on here.

What you are seeing has been pretty much the case for me every time, both on foam and critters. That's why I use Beman ICS Bowhunter 500s myself.  I also tend to shoot them more accurately.
Kanati 58" 44# @ 28" Green glass on a green riser
Bear Kodiak Magnum 52" 45# @ 28"
Bodnik Slick Stick longbow 58" 40# @ 28"
Bodnik Kiowa 52" 45# @ 28"
Kanati 58" 46# @ 28" R.I.P (2007-2015)
Self-made Silk backed Hickory Board bow 67" 49# @ 28"
Bear Black Bear 60" 45# @28"
NRA Life Member

Offline bmb

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 427
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2010, 10:45:00 AM »
yeah the carbon penetrated better. no broadheads just field points. and i shot every shot from 15 yards.....and yes lots of variables:)

Offline Bill Carlsen

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3928
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2010, 11:06:00 AM »
In my experience carbon surpasses all arrow materials I have shot for penetration...both in targets and game. You can even improve on the penetration by adding weigh to the point end. I like 220-225 grains on the front of my carbons and they go thru everything I shoot. My wife shoots 9nl6 45# 26" and I set up her arrows  the same way. She always gets two holes or a pass thru.
The best things in life....aren't things!

Offline bmb

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 427
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2010, 11:11:00 AM »
yeah ive been shooting carbon for 2 years after shooting aluminium for years. even though i only shoot a 150 gr. head i have never had trouble punching thru both sides of a deer or hog. i will still probably try out the cedars on deer. this is my first experience with wood arrows but carbons will always be my go to material.

Offline Ragnarok Forge

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3034
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2010, 11:28:00 AM »
Skinny shafts can trump higher mass arrows for penetration.  That super skinny shaft makes a big difference.  Put more weight up front and shoot a skinny carbon and an aluminum or wood at the same weight and you will really see a difference.
Clay Walker
Skill is not born into anyone.  It is earned thru hard work and perseverance.

Offline Arrow4Christ

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 557
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2010, 11:56:00 AM »
You also have to take into account tuning...if all the arrows aren't tuned equally (which would be quite a task to achieve shooting off the shelf) you aren't going to get accurate results.

Craig

Offline bmb

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 427
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2010, 12:03:00 PM »
all these arrows are tuned to perfection. especially well since i use a clicker.

Offline LBR

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4221
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2010, 12:07:00 PM »
Targets aren't animals.  Foam grabs; flesh separates and blood, water, and fat lubricate.

Like most everything else, there's a ton of variables to consider.  There's no magic arrow, just like there's no magic broadhead, or bow, or string.

All things equal, carbon may out-penetrate on an animal--if it does, it won't be nearly as dramatic a difference as you see on a target.

If you get a chance, watch Fred Bear's "Mozambique Game Trails", and/or read "Fred Bear's Field Notes--The Adventures of Fred Bear".  Mr. Bear killed a bull elephant with one arrow, pulling around 70#.  He didn't have a carbon arrow, or a single bevel broadhead, or a "super" string, or a "super" bow.  Elephant was just as dead.

Offline Don Stokes

  • Tradbowhunter
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *
  • Posts: 2607
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2010, 12:15:00 PM »
Foam and animals are totally different. The test is academically significant, I suppose, but it has nothing to do with killing animals. As long as I still have to pull my fat hardwood shafts out of the ground on the other side, I won't worry about it.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.- Ben Franklin

Offline smoke1953

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1200
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2010, 12:16:00 PM »
Myself I'd like to go to a heavier wood and up that weight by at least 150gr. and take it to some flesh and bone and see how we do.  But that's just me and the Northern Mist that loves that kind of arrow.

Offline bmb

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 427
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2010, 12:25:00 PM »
i totally agree with you guys. thats why i said im still gonna use the cedars this season. im going hog hunting sunday and i think im gonna put at least 2 cedars in my dawgware quiver..along with my carbons. and even though my target isnt flesh and bone, you have to admit that, the carbon is doing something good, if its going deeper:)

Offline Arrow4Christ

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 557
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2010, 12:36:00 PM »
They may look like they're flying the same, but I highly doubt that variety of arrows is all tuned perfectly to your bow. You'd have to bareshaft or paper tune them to be sure. Are you shooting off the shelf?
I agree, good carbon makes an awesome arrow, and it's much easier to make up a good, reliable carbon than it is a good, reliable wood arrow  ;)

Offline bmb

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 427
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #13 on: July 06, 2010, 12:39:00 PM »
they are all bareshafted and paper tuned.

Offline ronnyg

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: theory-not working like i thought:)
« Reply #14 on: July 06, 2010, 08:16:00 PM »
Carbon arrows recover faster upon impact, which also aids in penetration

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©