ONe more note. A few years after passing the 1-buck rule a survey of KY hunters showed the overwhelming majority liked it. Here's the difference for me. There are places in this country one can hunt and know for almost certainty they have no chance of seeing any buck older than 1.5 years (nice spike, forky, or maybe a 5-6 point). Then there are places where you know old bucks have been taken, seen, etc. Whether or not I want to wait for a chance at one of these older (read big-racked) deer or not, knowing it could happen adds tremendously to my hunt. Maybe a little closer to home. If you use scouting cameras. You have two cameras out which are 400 yards apart in different areas of the farm. One has dozens of pictures of does and small bucks. The other has does, small bucks and a bruiser or two. Which one will you hunt? I know, wind, time of the year, access, etc. also enter the equation but you know the point I'm trying to make.
Personally, while some of my fellow biologists would disagree with me, I like to see lots of deer (1-10) every time I hunt. But, the possibility that a 182 could come by adds a touch of excitement to my hunt that you can't imagine until you've been there. My elderly neighbor killed a gross 182 (net 168) with a rifle the fall I was building my house (2006)-- he killed it about 400 yards from my house. I know he's dead.... but the conditions that produced him are as prevalent as ever.