Originally posted by chopx2:
I always find this line of questioning funny since so many trad shooters insist they shoot instinctively which by definition means you have no idea how far the animal is before you shoot.
That is virtually impossible, when a grounder is caught in center field and the baseball player sees the runner heading home he probably doesn't think o that is 75 yards, he just knows it is far.
When a animal is farther than "close" you instinctively know you need to raise your bow arm to compensate for drop.
The only difference between the way I shoot and the way the Indians shot is that simple fact that I grew up in a society where measurement systems are equally uniform.
When I draw back the bow I see a target as a whole, then the specific region on a target, then minuscule details upon that target. It doesn't matter how far the target is, the process and the method of aiming is exactly the same.
Anyway, I realize that your original post was not in anyway directed towards me, but I seem to hear that a lot . . .