I think longer bows (62-70") are intrinsically more "accurate" than short bows (58" and under). Mass weight and string angle are two reasons for this. Compounders get past the string angle problem by using string loops instead of hooking releases directly to the string, but finger shooters can't do that. I think this is mostly an academic question that relates more to target shooting than hunting accuracy. I believe that even the "short bow" fans would probably shoot better scores on indoor, field, and 3-D courses if they used longer, target-style bows, but there are many things besides intrinsic accuracy that make a bow desirable for hunting, like handling qualities, or "feel," however you want to define that. To use an analogy, a long-barreled, 12-pound varmint rifle w/ a 10 ounce trigger would probably outshoot a 6 1/2 pound carbine on the range, but would be a poor choice for carrying in the thickets. Whatever intrinsic accuracy advantage it had would be offset by its poor handling qualities. The lighter, shorter rifle would shoot "better" under real-world hunting conditions, in effect. So it is with bows. JMO, Paul.