Falk, I'm not sure about you, but if you take your accuracy seriously, you bareshaft...
Ever try bareshafting woodies? Don't work so well...
Sooo, any whooo...
Matching aluminum deflection to the same deflection in wood saves you a whole bunch of money in the long run.
I love bows. Bows cost money. Hunting trips cost money. Poorly spined arrows are firewood.
People get discouraged buying expensive firewood.
People stop buying woodies. Woodie dealers go out of business.
The "rigid" ones can find woodies anymore.
Have to go to Easton deflection anyway...
I've never even seen a simple chart comparing common aluminum arrows with wood arrow poundage.
Besides, demystifying and standardizing the wooden arrow spine is going to do nothing but bring more people back to shooting wood.
Think about it...with the advent of glass laminations, R/D bows, and especially FF strings, some sort of change should have been made...
All of this add five pounds for a "modern recurve," add another five pounds for "FF string"...add five more pounds for hardwood shafts over cedar because they don't recover as quickly, add another five pounds if your bow is cut close to center...
...so, I need an #80 spine out of a #67 LB? Or is it a #75 spine? And what about poplar versus chundoo? What about hickory versus Ash? And are hexpine shafts hardwood? And how does laminated birch behave compared to hexpine?
Can you tell I've been trying to make the transition? Lol...