Originally posted by *****:
I stopped shooting animals a couple of years ago, tho I still hunt every season. I figure that I've gotten my share, and if I don't "need" the meat for myself or my family, why take a life. I know I can do it. . . just don't need to. If the day comes when I do need the meat, I'll go get it, but wanton killing just because you can isn't perfecting your skills, it's just greed.
I now hunt to out-smart them, keep my skills sharp, but don't need to kill. Ain't hungry enough.
I mean no offense by what I'm about to say. It's just my opinion.
If you enjoy getting out in the woods that's great, but that is just not hunting, its observing. Hunting IS about killing. To say otherwise is just not honest and just not hunting. There is a huge difference physically and emotionally when you look at an animal you intend to kill. There is a personal responsibility that comes before and after the fingers release.
What is "needing" the meat? Unless you are a vegetarian, an animal died for that meat you bought at the store. Even if you are a vegetarian, something died so that veg could be planted. On the farm or in the wild, those chicken tenders came from a living, breathing creature whether you did the actual killing or not.
To say that you outsmarted an animal that you didn't shoot at is, in my opinion, just human arrogance. It is not giving the animal the credit it's earned. I have seen animals do amazing things between the time I release that arrow and when it sticks bloodless in the ground!
Why hunt? Today, there are some that may fall under the greed or ego banner, but for most it's just inside you, from way back when people just like you kept everyone else alive.
YMMV!