3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon  (Read 530 times)

Offline RodL

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 238
Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« on: March 15, 2011, 08:24:00 PM »
For those who have shot both, in your opinion, do the skinny ones penetrate better than the regular sized ones? Any problems with shooting broadheads? I only shoot 2 blade broadheads out of a 45lb bow. Thanks for your opinions on this topic

Rodney

Offline Shawn Leonard

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 7837
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2011, 08:26:00 PM »
They may penetrate a bit better with a field point but with a broadhead I would say it would be negligible. Shoot what flies best for ya! Shawn
Shawn

Offline RodL

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 238
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2011, 12:05:00 AM »
Thanks again Shawn, I have always shot goldtip tradtionals but was curious about the penetration of the slim carbons. Thanks again for the PM about the arrows I was looking for.

Rodney

Offline Skipmaster1

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 950
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2011, 12:18:00 AM »
I have shot both and have gone back to the Axis/MFX shafts. I think they are tougher than most arrows and I do believe they penetrate a little better. Maybe on through a perfect chest shot....I mean an exit is an exit no matter how much "more" one penetrated. I think with a shot that accidently catches the back of the scapula  or some other bone, the edge would go to the skinny shafts....

Offline Skipmaster1

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 950
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2011, 12:19:00 AM »
Of course shawn is right though, shoot whatever shoots the best for you!

Offline Ray Lyon

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3904
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2011, 07:59:00 AM »
Perfect arrow flight would be the #1 choice. If you have that with both, then skinnier is better, all else being equal.

I personally use Axis shafting. It flies great and is extremely durable. I've used AD Traditionals, Grizzly Sticks, Black Hawk Vapor Carbonwood and Beman MFX, but the Axis is what I've found works best for me.
Tradgang Charter Member #35

Offline Javi

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 704
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2011, 08:19:00 AM »
Not only do the skinny shafts like the Axis penetrate better, they also don't get pushed as much by the wind..
Mike "Javi" Cooper
TBoT Member

Offline rnharris

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2011, 08:47:00 AM »
beemans for me very tough fly great too the skinny dia. also puts the shaft closer to center as well great shaft!

carbon express's are my second choice good shaft beemans seem more durable on hard impacts!
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline monkeyball

  • Moderator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 1745
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2011, 10:55:00 AM »
Skinny is in for me,great flight,super penetration,and quick recovery around the riser makes it all a GO for me.
                            Good Shooting,
                                     Craig

Offline Jason R. Wesbrock

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2507
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2011, 11:11:00 AM »
I agree with Shawn.

Offline ishoot4thrills

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3445
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2011, 03:49:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by monkeyball:
Skinny is in for me,great flight,super penetration,and quick recovery around the riser makes it all a GO for me.
                            Good Shooting,
                                     Craig
X2     :thumbsup:
58" JK Traditions Kanati Longbow
Ten Strand D10 String
Kanati Bow Quiver
35/55 Gold Tip Pink Nugents @ 30"
3 X 5" Feathers
19.9% FOC
49# @ 26.75"
165 FPS @ 10.4 GPP (510 gr. hunting arrow)
171 FPS @ 9.7 GPP (475 gr. 3D arrow)
3 Fingers Under

Offline ArrowAtomik

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 301
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2011, 04:42:00 PM »
They do penetrate better, that is just physics... how much better on a live animal is always hard to say, but on foam, what I have seen, it is pretty clear.

Offline LimBender

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 1080
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #12 on: March 16, 2011, 04:54:00 PM »
Other than weight and maybe slightly better grading, what are the difference between Easton Axis and Beman MFX (Beman is owned by Easton)?  

Do you guys have more problems with fletching and inserts on the skinny arrows?
>>>---TGMM Family of the Bow--->

Shoot some Zippers and a Bear.

Offline ishoot4thrills

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3445
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #13 on: March 16, 2011, 07:08:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by LimBender:
Other than weight and maybe slightly better grading, what are the difference between Easton Axis and Beman MFX (Beman is owned by Easton)?  

Do you guys have more problems with fletching and inserts on the skinny arrows?
As far as I know, the Beman MFX Classic is basically an ST Axis with wood grain graphics applied. I may be mistaken though.

I have no problems at all with fletching or with inserts with my skinny Bemans.
58" JK Traditions Kanati Longbow
Ten Strand D10 String
Kanati Bow Quiver
35/55 Gold Tip Pink Nugents @ 30"
3 X 5" Feathers
19.9% FOC
49# @ 26.75"
165 FPS @ 10.4 GPP (510 gr. hunting arrow)
171 FPS @ 9.7 GPP (475 gr. 3D arrow)
3 Fingers Under

Offline RodL

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 238
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #14 on: March 16, 2011, 07:34:00 PM »
Thanks again to all that responded.

Rodney

Offline Terry Green

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 28640
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2011, 07:39:00 PM »
I agree with Shawn and Jason...arrow flight is paramount as well as accuracy and bhead sharpness...all else is a fraction of a difference...skinny is better.....less it breaks.  I'd opt for durability on delivering the goods.  Not saying skinny aint durable...heck if I know...been shooting Arrow Dynamics exclusively for 8 years or so....accurate, good flight and durable...not problem with penetration...BUT, I'm not shooting light draw weight bows either.
Tradbowhunting Video Store - https://digitalstore.tradgang.com/

Tradgang Bowhunting Merchandise - https://tradgang.creator-spring.com/?

Tradgang DVD - https://www.tradgang.com/tgstore/index.html

"It's important,  when going after a goal, to never lose sight of the integrity of the journey" - Andy Garcia

'An anchor point is not a destination, its  an evolution to conclusion'

Online Jim Wright

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1324
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2011, 08:00:00 PM »
I have been shoting the Beman MFXs for a good while now and they are hard to beat in my opinion. They are very consistent in weight and spine as well apparently as I have never shot another carbon quite as well and I have tried a couple. They cost a few dollars more but to me are well worth it.

Offline DBinAlamo

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 134
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2011, 10:04:00 PM »
I've had good luck with most of my carbon shafts, right now I'm shooting Axis and I do notice a slight increase in penetration on my target, and they are super tough, I'll stick with these shafts for awhile...DB
A&H ACS 64" 50#@28" 3DH Riser.
Strive for excellence....  Not perfection.
"If your not working hard, someone else is" Dentler.

Offline JJB2

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2011, 10:17:00 PM »
Skinnier shaft behind the BH with less friction/drag through the animal should equate to better penetration.  If I recall correctly the Ashby study talked about the benefit of using a shaft that was smaller in diameter than the ferrule of the BH.  BH punches the hole and the narrow arrow follows with less drag, allowing the BH to penetrate better.

I've been using the easton FMJ's and really like em.  Durable, narrow and relatively heavy.
Life is tough but it's tougher when you're stupid." - John Wayne

Offline Southern Sam

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 124
Re: Skinny carbons vs regular carbon
« Reply #19 on: March 17, 2011, 12:15:00 PM »
Beman mfx classics for me!  Tough as nails and penetrate very well on hard hits. The wood grain graphic adds the weight to the mfx and the axis shaft in the same spine size does not.  If you want heavier, go with the bemans.
Black Widow PMA X 46#@30"

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©