i'll try to get back on track for Paul the Viking!! heres my personal oppinion of the Nano i own.
64" 50# @ 28
Pros.
1. First bow i ever owned tapped for a plunger. I said what the heck and installed it. its drilled for two holes ( one for shooting off the shelf and other one higher for targets)..settled on the higher one...A little tweaking and adjusting after reading up on how to set a berger button, and i was dialed in. matter of fact i loved it so much, i drilled out my personal homemade recurve and installed a plunger. What's real nice is i can shoot broadhead weights from 125 to 300gr by just adjusting the plunger tension.. best arrow flight i ever had..............so in short really LIKE the plunger option....I'm not ready to dominate Fita but i know i can pound a hog with a range of BH's without having to adjust my old leather side plate
2. Carbon Riser......did not grab me at first. Really thought i was not a great enough shot to tell any difference between that and Bodark (ex.). Also thought the light riser weight would transmit hand shock....so i got a 50#er...i normally hunt with 68# to 70#......WISHED i had gotten a 70lber!!!!!!!!!!!! Makes sense now why Holt and some others have gone to all carbon risers. I really like the light weight riser as opposed to my heavier T/D longbow riser. It swings as fast as my lighter mass weight longbows through the target.
3. Handle grip....i thought at first too skinny .. no problem,i would put a glob of Form-a-grip on it , spray paint it black and "get it Right"..the redneck way ( buy something NEW and fix it). Well i forgot who was building it and which country wins gold medals...it wasnt rednecks like me from North MS.. The grip seats PERFECTLY in my hand like i suppose all those "target punchers" know how a torque free grip should...i spared the riser the Form a Grip...gosh i am glad.. how ugly would that have been.
4. Perfomance..Now thats a wide open subject...speed? handshock? cast? etc.....having layed up a limb or two myself
, Of all the factors, heres what impresses me the most...the limbs cast the string straight. Sounds simple...it's not and today slow motion cameras show it. i guess if your limbs are made out of a multi-million dollar machine, they better be straight...these are straight....and in time. i liked that.. I have never layed up a carbon limb, i know its light mass is attractive for a lighter limb design but i am impressed with limb recovery.. it is fast and quick...no excessive vibration after the shot..of coarse i measured this with no stringer silencers and still dont have any on it....it's quiet real quiet i like that.. limb bolt to carbon may lend that hand.
5. Speed.. it's not the fastest..but is in upper class..but speed has it gives and takes....usually a faster bow is noiser.......i like an Accurate bow..this fits the bill
6. finish .....woven carbon is growing on me..its not warm fuzzy feeling and looking like wood because it aint wood.. it's different..
Cons
1. Stickers or logos......totally not traditional...got to thinking why? well to me it appeared that they made this bow to market to the guys coming from compound that wasnt ready for cocobolo and red elm just yet.. sort of a 'bridge' bow. honestly..i think that was a smart marketing move..maybe brillant...they probably asked themselves "Why jump in the market with a wood bow when there are already some fantastic bowyers out there"..."How can we be different?" "ok this is different, who can make a carbon riser in USA?"...."where can you buy carbon blocks?" .......see the trail?...This is not their official response but only my assumptions. I do have a BBA in marketing.. it's from Ole Miss and yes..our football team suxs.
2. price .. it's steep...However There are a couple of bows out there more expensine with substantial less cost of material in them.. Carbon is expensive when you buy it like they have too. Have you checked ACE hardware's price lately? exactly..you just cant get it unless from oversees to make a riser out of it.. so i give them that....so then i put my logical hat on...Who's making one? Who can make it?...There was no longbow being made by this company (win and win)...R&R..start from scratch....20 trips overseas , staying for week at a time..thats exspensive!!....they also had to buy molds, cad work, re buy molds...etc...i'm guessing it might have cost 50 to 100,000 ball park. there has got to be some mark up to recoup your investment.... basically the bow is expensive because the material are expensive and it was a start up project. only my oppinion.
is it worth it? each one of us is the judge...if you only judge a product on where it's made..then No this bow is not worth it.....then you will probably need to also re-evaluate your Full Metal jacket with that magnus stinger on it too...etc...