I just traded for a Schultz Trophy Hunter longbow, 55#@27" and 69" long. 4 lams bamboo with brown glass belly and back. Not positive what the riser wood is, but I believe it is myrtle. Pretty nice looking bow and shoots pretty nicely as well. This bow is the first Hill style bow that I have gotten, other than my Howard Hill Rogue that is around 95# @ 29" and 68" long, even though it is listed as 80#@27". I got the rogue for a training bow, and decided to try one out that was a little lighter in draw weight. Here are some pics of them.
I don't know if the pics will show it well, but here are some of the differences that I see in the bows. The Schultz as a little finer taper to the tips and narrower limb profile, although I don't know how much of that is due to the differences in draw weight. The Schultz has a deeper core that the Hill, despite the draw weight. The grips are different, even though you can't see that in the pics. My Hill has a contoured grip that tapers almost to a point at the palm, which really puts me in the right grip position. They both shoot really nice, but the differences in draw weights makes it difficult to compare them adequately. I would have to say that I prefer the grip on my Hill better but I am going to reserve final judgement for a while.