Originally posted by Coachy:
How can you say that a certain knife suits a certain finish ? Sorry I just dont get it . I thought it would be more of a personal thing . How could say ,, a fillet knife suit a polished finish ,, where as a skinner would suit a forged finish ?
Anyway ,, looking forward to more opinions
Sorry, just to clarify. Certain 'styles' of knife do suit certain finishes. A buffalo handled, fileworked bowie, for examle, would just look wrong with a forged finish, same with a Scandinavian puuko. However, a frontier style, stag handled bowie would suit a forged or quenched finish. I know that I've made quite a few now that in my head were going to be left 'rough' but when they're actually made, just look wrong. They've been stripped down, polished & re-built & suddenly look right! It's kinda hard to explain, but certain makers make knives that follow a particular 'style' (try a Google search for Dave Budd) that just look 'old' & a forged or quenched finish just seems right for that style.
Again, blade grinds can determine which finish looks the best. A convex ground blade, with no secondary bevel will never, ever look good with anything other than a polished or satin finish, as it encompasses the entire blade from spine to edge. A hollow or Scandi grind blade can go either way, because you've got a large, flat, unground surface above the grind line. Same with a sabre grind. A full flat grind seems to suit a fine satin finish, although it can be left 'unfinshed' behind the ricasso.
It's not nesceserraly the overall shape of the knife you're looking at more the individual parts & the way it all hangs together. If you look at the picture of the knife I posted, with the quenched finish I see it as an iron-age inspired hunting knife. In overall shape, style & finish. If I polished up the same blade & added a rosewood or black micarta handle, it'd be exactly the same knife, but it'd be seen as a kitchen/veggie knife! It's all about perception.
I think!