Charlie, there are enough deer in the Adirondacks that if you are able to adapt and read sign more than just looking at tracks and rubs you will kill a deer there with some regularity. The numbers are nothing close to what we have down here but there are enough. I have a close friend who kills a buck every year in Schroon, Minerva or Indian Lake all of which have low deer densities. I have never heard him complain that there arent deer in the Adirondacks. My cousin, (No, Not Ray) kills at least a doe during bow season and a buck during gun season every year in Indian Lake, very low density.
Before I started bowhunting again I hunted there more than in the southern zone and saw deer 2 out of 3 times, some close shots that I could have made with my longbows.
And there are big bucks there as there have always been. Not like some imagine but they are there. They get big by age and low hunting pressure and not nutrition. Thats a hard deer to hunt and takes more time invested than I can put into it but they are there.
Forest manipulation with logging would probably increase deer 10 fold. I personally like the idea of letting the land heal from 150 years of intense logging and revert back to wilderness (regrown wilderness if there is such a thing.)
To stick to the thread topic the bucks are there (Dacks) as they have always been, not much improvement in antlers but theyre there. And it seems to me that in the Southern Zone, certainly there is antler improvement in many parts of the state due to self imposed restiction and antler regs (not my self imposed restriction, I like venison).