LOL! I wish it all made perfect sense to me.
i just got through typing about 3 pages here to try and explain the dynamics in layman terms and i decided to bag the whole idea. there is just nothing simple about it.
a single carbon limb with the carbon directly on the back of the limb adds more strength with less mass weight and you get better performance in terms of speed.
a double carbon bow with the carbon directly on the belly and back becomes a different animal all together. you have two opposing forces stronger than steel and lighter weight than fiberglass. But when it's put under a load it's only as strong as the material it is glued to, or the glue joint itself. if it's not balance perfectly, or even when it is, if it is drawn over the design limitations.... Kaaaaa-Boom! thar she blows mate!
Now take those two pieces of carbon belly and back and put veneers and glass over them.... no problem. but you've just lost some of your horse power by adding the extra weight to the limb. The carbon still does its job in the stability department though, and it's a very good trade off in a recurve limb.
Now when you put a third piece of carbon in the middle between these two opposing forces i believe it effects the neutral plane in that it's acting as an opposing force to the back and belly carbon. Even though it's in the neutral plane, the fact is, it does not compress. So it's taking on a load and easing the load typically transferred to the belly carbon alone....
Did you get all that? Ya...Riiiiight.... Clear as mud eh.
The really weird part about it is... if you just put one piece of carbon in the center of the limb using glass belly and back you just bought yourself a very expensive racing stripe. There is no advantage at all.IMO... You might as well use a piece of wood that is lighter weight.
sorry i got long winded here... my first attempt was 3 times as long. :rolleyes: