Here in Virginia, we call it "big woods" hunting as opposed to "woodlot" hunting.
There's no doubt hunting big woods is a much harder game. Lots of acorns makes it even tougher.
Scouting will find the acorns that the deer are actually eating. If your mast crop is that good, there will be acorns (like white oak acorns) that they will key on first, and then proceed to the less desirable ones.
Assuming I can find where they are currently feeding, I then try to look at the woods as fields.
Here's what I'm talking about. If you will consider big, mature timber as a field (ie somewhere you wouldn't normally find a deer bedding during the day) you will have half your work done through elimination. By eliminating the really open woods and concentrating on geographic features (funnels, rivers, cliffs) and thick undergrowth (laurel thickets, ivy thickets, storm/blowdown damage) you should be able to come up with a reasonable idea of #1 where they are bedding, #2 where they are eating, and #3 their travel routes.
Now with those areas/routes in mind and remembering where your "fields" are...focus on the edges within the big woods. Whitetails relate to edges a tremendous amount.
If you look at the woods as a whole you see nothing but trees and trees and trees. But picturing the big woods as your own little wood lot with adjacent fields helps you focus on where you need to be.
Big woods hunting isn't easy. I hunt with a guy who all but loses it when he steps foot into this type of hunting. It can be very, very intimidating.
But, I truly believe, using this line of thought, you'll end up putting the pieces of the puzzle together.
Sorry to be so lengthy. This is actually a topic my buddies and I have discussed dozens of times. We all pretty well agree that this helps in finding the deer.