3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH  (Read 3096 times)

Online DesertDude

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2058
What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« on: October 21, 2012, 11:23:00 PM »
I fully understand the pro's and con's of carbon arrows with high FOC. Done that, Single bevel, that too, but when I started 125gr Field point/Broadhead was the standard. I shot my first critter with it, forward 20 years now I hear you need more BH weight.

  While making up some Cedar arrows with good old Zwickey's Delta's or Eskimo's I remember when this set up was the norm. I don't know, maybe I'm just getting tired trying to keep up with the ever changing world of Trad Archery.

  I love all the new ideas, new bows, arrows, BH, and all the new gear. I know this new stuff works, but the Old norm still works also.


  DD.....
DesertDude >>>----->

US Navy (Retired)
1978-1998

Offline yukon chuck

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 542
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2012, 11:28:00 PM »
Funny you mention it, as I was just thinking the same thing. Just last week I pulled out some Cedars and some Aluminums with 125 grain points and broadheads. Shot well. I've had good luck with heavier set ups, but as you said, the old set ups seemed to work just fine on animals I killed back in the day.
>>>--TGMM Family Of The Bow-->
Compton Traditional Bowhunters
Michigan Longbow Association
Yucketsville Buffalo & Cricket Association

"Always be kind, for everyone is fighting a hard battle". -Plato

Offline GRINCH

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 4662
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2012, 11:31:00 PM »
I'm hunting this year with some old bear arrows with 125 grain broadheads I got fom Pappa Frank,shoot realy good for me out of my bows.
TGMM Family of The Bow,
USN 1973-1995

Offline Widow's Son

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 303
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2012, 11:39:00 PM »
Those arrows are still around. Just look in my bow quiver.

Ross
1969 Bear Super Kodiak 45#
1966 Bear Kodiak 52#
2000 Black Widow MAII
46# at 28"
Roy Hall Navajo Stick, 64" Caddo 55#@28"

Offline Brianlocal3

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4846
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2012, 11:41:00 PM »
I shoot 125 up front no matter the material.  My woodies for hunting have No Mercy 4 blades, and my Alums I shoot Bear Razorheads w/o the bleeders and 125 thunderheads.  I do not like the EFOC setups.
JD Berry Taipan (original) 53@28 62”
Cascade mountain Brush Hawk 53@28 56”

Offline legends1

  • Tradbowhunter
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *
  • Posts: 1793
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2012, 11:44:00 PM »
Still work for me!

Offline **DONOTDELETE**

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 10441
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2012, 11:51:00 PM »
i think going with heavier points started about the time guys started trying to get carbon shafts flying decent.

Not a thing wrong with 125 grain heads in my book.
Realistically they probably shoot a lot flatter trajectory too.

Offline slivrslingr

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 975
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2012, 01:57:00 AM »
I've come full circle with my arrows, started with aluminum and 125 gr. Bears, to woodies, to carbons, and now back to woodies.  My current arrows are Doug Fir shafts with 125 gr. Zwicky Eskimos and I have to utmost confidence in them.  Now I just need to get a shot at some game!

Offline Bjorn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 8789
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2012, 02:32:00 AM »
I'm shooting Cedars and Fir with 160 gn points and BH's. I like the extra durability of the heavier head. I too tried the FOC and EFOC and ran out of spine real fast with wood-even tried carbons but did not like the flight; I like the feel and warmth of wood.

Offline Green

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3003
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2012, 03:28:00 AM »
Another POC and 125 fan here.
ASL's, Selfbows, and Wood Arra's
Just because you are passionate about something, doesn't mean you don't suck at it.

Offline Rod in SC

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 112
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2012, 05:46:00 AM »
I "know" that front loaded carbons will penetrate better than a wood arrow with that good ol zwickey eskimo BUT my eyes dont confirm it.
Rod Martin

Offline AWPForester

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 490
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #11 on: October 22, 2012, 08:21:00 AM »
I use what I got which is anywhere from 125 grains upto 220 grains.  I like he heavier heads for longevity and durability.  I keep only the 160 or lighter on the woodies.  They do just fine.  I have a freezer that says a 500 grain surewood fir outta of a 59 pound Maddog longbow, tipped with the proven MA-3's at 125 grains, will shoot through them as quick as a 20% foc carbon anyday.

I think it is like everything else in the market today.  Gotta have it because it is better. Only proven by marketing, not results.  Funny, these broadheads cost as much or more per one as a half dozen of the proven.  I still wander why guys can't connect the dots on tha one.   God Bless
Psalm 25:3 Yea, let none that wait on thee be ashamed: Let them be ashamed which transgress without cause.

Offline Hermon

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2127
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2012, 08:36:00 AM »
Personally, the only reason that I am shooting a heavier broadhead right now is that I have a supply of 60-65 POC from when I was younger and cannot shoot that heavy a bow any more.  So I am using heavier broadheads to get the shafts to work for me.  When I run out of these shafts I will probably go back to 125 bh's.

Offline SELFBOW19953

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1461
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2012, 08:52:00 AM »
I just went to a stronger wood than cedar (they break if you look at them wrong).  I started hunting with 150 gr BH, now I shoot 160 Snuffers.
SELFBOW19953
USAF Retired (1971-1991)
"Somehow, I feel that arrows made of wood are more in keeping with the spirit of old-time archery and require more of the archer himself than a more modern arrow."  Howard Hill from "Hunting The Hard Way"

Offline Brad Arnett

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 275
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2012, 08:53:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DesertDude:
I fully understand the pro's and con's of carbon arrows with high FOC. Done that, Single bevel, that too, but when I started 125gr Field point/Broadhead was the standard. I shot my first critter with it, forward 20 years now I hear you need more BH weight.

  While making up some Cedar arrows with good old Zwickey's Delta's or Eskimo's I remember when this set up was the norm. I don't know, maybe I'm just getting tired trying to keep up with the ever changing world of Trad Archery.

  I love all the new ideas, new bows, arrows, BH, and all the new gear. I know this new stuff works, but the Old norm still works also.


  DD.....
I don't think anyone says it won't work or that you NEED heavy front loaded carbons to kill deer. the nature of light stiff carbons pretty much requires upping point weight to soften them up.

I shoot front loaded carbons, my wife shoots cedars (this year they are poplar) shafts with 135gr 2-blade Zwickeys up front. I've shot no deer yet this season and she is done and has shot her 2 bucks already with her MOAB and polpars......so the woods are definitely better if you ask her.       :D      :D    

Put it where it counts and it doesn't matter as long as the head is sharp and the arrow is tuned to the bow. Her mid 40's# MOAB has gotten complete pass throughs on 3 of the 4 deer she has shot with it......all with woodies and either a 125 Magnus or a 135 Zwickey.

Online DesertDude

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2058
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #15 on: October 22, 2012, 09:03:00 AM »
I'm in no way saying one is better than the other, just woundering what happened to the Old Standerd. I to shoot from 125gr bh to 160gr bh on my woods.  Just thinking out loud.
DesertDude >>>----->

US Navy (Retired)
1978-1998

Offline oldgrouch

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #16 on: October 22, 2012, 09:17:00 AM »
Archery is like any other "leisure" activity nowadays. Be it golf or fishing etc.

We now have so many great suppliers and they need repeat business to stay in business. Get the customers to constantly upgrade or by the latest/greatest.

And the so called short cuts are always popular any any sport and short cuts cost money.
The older I get, the better I was.

Offline Brad Arnett

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 275
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2012, 09:39:00 AM »
I thinks its just ease of use and time. I know its much less time consuming to sit down and have a dozen carbons up and running than to make a dozen woodies. I'm not saying the carbons are better, just faster/easier to make.

I shot woodies for years and years and carbons are relatively new to me. I'm likely going back to woodies next season as well. They smell better when broken than does broken carbon.   ;)

Offline beauleyse

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #18 on: October 22, 2012, 09:44:00 AM »
I shot my first deer with 125gr Steel Force heads and Cedar shafts as well...I swamped to carbon because as a wheel shooter I hardly ever broke an arrow and so far the same as been with trad arrows and carbons... Plus I just love to watch that heavy arrow arc into the sweet spot each time.
There is more fun in hunting with the handicap of the bow and arrow, than hunting with the sureness of the gun. -Fred Bear

Offline Gila Mike

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 122
Re: What ever happened to a Cedar arrow & 125gr BH
« Reply #19 on: October 22, 2012, 10:10:00 AM »
You're not alone, Mark. There are plenty of us oldtimers still shooting the same arrow setups in the same type of bows that we shot thirty, forty or even fifty years ago.

I shot POCs until the late 1970s and then switched over to Easton aluminum arrows. No setup changes since then.

Mike
"Hunt ethically and in fair chase. You'll know the feeling when you have done it right!"  .......(Glenn St. Charles, Bows on the Little Delta)

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©