Originally posted by Otto:
I'd be willing to wager that if you put every recurve made by all the top bowyers and conducted a controlled test that there ain't 10 fps difference between the lot of em.
It means squat.
I'll take that bet... Because I already know the answer.
From what I've shot, with more arrow weight spread than what AMO would dictate, and at my 27" draw (mostly with a Damascas glove) it's not uncommon to see 20-30 FPS between makers.
The only recurve I've seen shoot as fast as a Schafer is a Black Widow. I've spent time with Toelke's, Dale Dyes, all the production makers including Hoyt, Bears Paw, Yellowstone, Robertson Stykbow, and I shot the hybrid Zipstick one piece LB.
I found the three BW takedown recurves I tested to all be noisier and generally more rude than Schafer recurves. I've chronographed 6 different 60# Schafers, with pretty much everything you could imagine for strings (of modern material) and they were all within a few FPS of eachother. They all had clear glass over veneers too, and I'd LOVE to shoot one with black Super E glass just to see what it'd do. Robertsons get my attention too. The 61# one I played with was in the high 180's
Anybody wants to send me a bow to chronograph, I'll do it for the fun of it. If I ever find a faster, more stable, more forgiving, and quieter bow than a 'Tip, I'll be writing a check the next week
Another poster said something about Shooting Chrony brand chronographs. I used to have an Oehler 35P until I shot it with and AR15. My hunting buddy has the same chrono as mine, and early on chronographing bows and rifles we used to run the two of them in tandem. Neither chronograph ever varied 2 FPS from the other when testing a bow indoors under artificial lighting. I've long gave up that practice.
Chronographs tell no lies... It's a very real measure of "horsepower" for bows. They can hurt a lot of guys egos.