Originally posted by don kauss:
At the risk of going against the grain, I am going to add another perspective;
Who decides that ANY given species is "trash?" And furthermore, what are the parameters for the decision? Because, if it's based on categories like "invasive" and "competing with native species" and "fast reproduction," I doubt there is any species more deserving than our own race.
I don't intend to start an argument, but it seems to me that all living things deserve our respect. Those are my thoughts, and you can keep the penny.
Let's take the Florida Everglades:
Invasive/non-native insects established and breeding 1000 plus varieties.
Invasive/non-native animals established and breeding 192 named varieties.
Plants? There are only 1301 Native species identified. There are 1392 Invasive/non-native varieties of which about 100 are listed as Category I and 12 of those are at the top of the list for eradication and destruction because of the rate that they spread and the damage they do.
Who identifies threats? Science
It is a fitting thing to respect plants and animals in their native habitat. It is also fitting to respect all life on some level.
Comparing the nature of animals and humans makes for an interesting conversation, but the dangers of developing anthropomorhphic alternative reality is only outweighed by the danger of denying the place of man in the food chain.