I think about this one a lot.
Yes, the networks and sponsors are really missing the boat on this one(what a shock!).
In the 1990's there was a resurgence in fly-fishing due to one movie, A River Runs Through It.
Now try and find a spinning rod in a TV commercial a greeting card,or print ad, you won't, it's all fly-fishing or a model pretending to be flyfishing.There are many tv shows now that are just flyfishing. Orvis, Sage, G Loomis, Simms, and the like, are crying all the way to the bank.
The same thing can happen for traditional bowhunting.
The Hunger Games....
I disagree on the "kill" aspect of hunting shows.
We all know that they are filming thousands of hours of video to get that compound kill sequence. The same thing could be done with a trad bow and an experienced hunter(ie. Fred Eichler, he does it already as does Tred Barta)
What we need is something that focuses on the process of hunting; scouting, building arrows, sharpening broadheads, building a ground blind, missing at times,etc. There's something to be said for having a novel approach to an endeavor.
However, if the network or sponsor thought it needed to be about the kill, it very well could be, why couldn't it?
Here's what it will take(are you listening big time sponsors?):
A sponsor willing to pay to have productions made(they are generally produced first, sold to the network later as a finished product)
A likeable, exceptional bowhunter or several, we have many in our midst.How does Bill Langer not have a nationally televised show?(have you seen some of the guys that do?)
The show airs, commercials for many of the same products we use and some specific to trad are shown.The show is different so it becomes popular.
(which equals happy sponsors)
It simply amazes me that no one has made the investment(I would if I had the capital).
It's probably going to take several of US to get this going, who else?
I realize I'm mostly preaching to the choir but this choir is growing.