3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Bare shaft tune question (pic)  (Read 459 times)

Offline Cyclic-Rivers

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17675
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #20 on: August 01, 2013, 05:23:00 PM »
OK folks it sounds like I have 2 smart options at this point.  I will give them a try and report back.  If the first trick works, I will quit there.  First I will try the strike plate. Then will play with point weight.

I will eventually use 250 grains up front for hunting.
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

Offline Cyclic-Rivers

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17675
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #21 on: August 01, 2013, 05:48:00 PM »
OK I built up the strike plate a bit.  The first pic was before, the second is Now.  suggestions at this point?  Is this acceptable?  Perhaps I should keep building up the strike plate?

 


 
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

Offline Shawn Leonard

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 7837
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #22 on: August 01, 2013, 06:08:00 PM »
Charlie, PM me with your draw length and what shafts you are shooting along with their spine. I will get ya on the money. I am pretty good at this! Shawn
Shawn

Offline grouseshooter002

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 511
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #23 on: August 01, 2013, 06:08:00 PM »
Charlie,
If you were to add feathers to the two bare shafts I believe that all four arrows would be right together. Why not try fletching them and shooting your broadheads. If you aren't satisfied you can always take the feathers back off.

Rick

Offline Cyclic-Rivers

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17675
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #24 on: August 01, 2013, 06:28:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by grouseshooter002:
Charlie,
If you were to add feathers to the two bare shafts I believe that all four arrows would be right together. Why not try fletching them and shooting your broadheads. If you aren't satisfied you can always take the feathers back off.

Rick
Thanks Rick, I was thinking to just fletch them all up but wanted them to be tuned right and didnt want "flaws" hidden by the fletching.  in all the bare shafting reports they were talking about getting the bare shafts to group with the fletched shafts.  I cannot seem to get that result.  

I built up my strike plate and the fletched arrows moved left and the bare shafts stayed right. This is at 28 yards, I am blinded by the sun any closer right now.

Maybe I am putting to much into it?
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

Offline Easykeeper

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1306
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #25 on: August 01, 2013, 07:17:00 PM »
Go back to the original strike plate thickness (so you are only changing one thing at a time), then put on the lightest point you have and see what happens.  You are just diagnosing at this point, not committing to the lighter point.

Offline Shawn Leonard

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 7837
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #26 on: August 01, 2013, 07:32:00 PM »
PM'ed ya bud. You are too stiff no doubt about it. Your bow would need to be 60#s at your draw to get where you want to be. You are still ok, just try what I PM'ed ya! I am shooting a new Caribow but past center and it is 54#s at my 28" draw and I am shooting a 29.5" .500 spine with 190 grains up front. Trust me, why would you shoot an arrow spined to be cut to 28-29" and shot from 60# compound bows out of a 50-55# recurve. It can be done but you need to add an awful lot of point weight. You are getting an opposite reaction cause you are way too stiff!! Shawn
Shawn

Offline ishoot4thrills

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3445
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #27 on: August 01, 2013, 07:58:00 PM »
HHHmmmmm.....never before thought about what Shawn is saying. Maybe he's on to something. I guess I never really saw what spine arrows you were shooting until I reread all of the posts. Yes, it would seem as though those arrows would be too stiff. Try going the opposite way instead and remove everything from the strike plate and see what happens then. You'd better be taking lots of breaks during the process before you get too tired also.
58" JK Traditions Kanati Longbow
Ten Strand D10 String
Kanati Bow Quiver
35/55 Gold Tip Pink Nugents @ 30"
3 X 5" Feathers
19.9% FOC
49# @ 26.75"
165 FPS @ 10.4 GPP (510 gr. hunting arrow)
171 FPS @ 9.7 GPP (475 gr. 3D arrow)
3 Fingers Under

Offline Cyclic-Rivers

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17675
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #28 on: August 01, 2013, 08:01:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Easykeeper:
Go back to the original strike plate thickness (so you are only changing one thing at a time), then put on the lightest point you have and see what happens.  You are just diagnosing at this point, not committing to the lighter point.
went to 75 grains, tried them at 100, 125, 145, 225 and 250.  all the same.

here is 100, 125 and 145.

 

 

 
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

Offline Cyclic-Rivers

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17675
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #29 on: August 01, 2013, 08:04:00 PM »
Makes sense Shawn, Thats why all my results are showing weak???
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

Offline Easykeeper

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1306
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #30 on: August 01, 2013, 08:14:00 PM »
Actually Shawn recommended a weaker shaft, your 5575 is a .400.  He is correct though that if you are getting any kind of contact from too stiff of a shaft it can appear as a weak reaction at the target and during tuning.

I would still guess you are weak, I always need a .340 in that bow range (heavy points though), but you can tell by the recommendations you are getting that there is really no accurate way to predict spine, there are just too many variables...not the least of which is our personal form.  What Shawn recommended would never work in my bow (50#29") but obviously does for him.  Might be a good idea to try a different spine.

I'm surprised you didn't get some visible change with that span of point weight.  I've found that once you are close you can see a stiff vs. weak reaction just 25 grains on either side of correct but if you are way off nothing seems to change or make sense.  The thing is...are you off weak or stiff.  I think you will need to try a different spine, maybe buy two or three to experiment with.

Good luck, bare shaft tuning can drive you nuts, but when you get it right you have fabulous arrow flight, and your bows will be as quiet and efficient as it can be...      :thumbsup:

Offline Shawn Leonard

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 7837
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #31 on: August 01, 2013, 08:29:00 PM »
Impossible that he is weak. I know a lot of guys including myself that shoot .400 spine cut to 29-30"s out of 62-65# bows tdrawn to 28-29"s and high performing bows and we need anywhere from 225 at a minimum to 325 grains up front depending on the bow. Think about it. I know several guys shooting 425 grain point weight and .500 spine cut to 29"s out of 50# longbows. Our own Rob(moderator)does!! I have been experimenting for 17 years with carbons and most times get guys very close, after hundreds and hundreds of PM's on the subject. Shawn
Shawn

Offline Cyclic-Rivers

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17675
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #32 on: August 01, 2013, 08:32:00 PM »
Taking Shawn's suggestions to Heart,  Have 100 Grain brass inserts coming this weekend.

Until then I will shoot wood.
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

Offline twistedlim

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 244
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #33 on: August 02, 2013, 02:21:00 PM »
It really is not that bad.  I think you will be much better off with and arrow that is a tad weak as opposed to too stiff.  Try some broad heads and see where you come in.

Offline Cyclic-Rivers

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17675
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #34 on: August 06, 2013, 07:36:00 AM »
OK played with the set up a bit.

Moved up to 350 grains up front.  Made a new string, played with brace height and nock height.  I am happy where I am at right now.

I will keep the temporary nock point on for when I foot the shaft, and shoot broadheads, just in case an adjustment is needed.

 

Thanks for the help.
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

Offline JLeMieux

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 227
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #35 on: August 06, 2013, 08:21:00 AM »
There you go!
Acadian Woods TD Recurve 58 @ 28
Acadian Woods Recurve 55 @ 28
Acadian Woods Tree Stick 60 @ 27
Acadian Woods Tree Stick 47 @ 28
Martin Hunter Recurve 50 @ 28

Offline Beanbag

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 242
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #36 on: August 06, 2013, 10:12:00 AM »
That's the ticket

Offline jhg

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #37 on: August 08, 2013, 11:39:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shawn Leonard:
...You are too stiff no doubt about it. Your bow would need to be 60#s at your draw to get where you want to be. ...You are getting an opposite reaction cause you are way too stiff!! Shawn
I tried Shawns advice and he is correct. False weak reading from carbons is common. The diff in how my bareshafts and fletched arrows fly once I went to a weaker spine, same weight up front, is astounding- night and day and I thought I was close before and cutting a stiffer spined arrow even more was what the bareshafts were telling but it was wrong-a false weak.

Joshua, shooting 400's over 31" long with 250ish up front from a 52# @31" center cut R/D longbow.
Learn, practice and pass on "leave no trace" ethics, no matter where you hunt.

Offline Keith Langford

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 259
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #38 on: August 08, 2013, 05:20:00 PM »
Replace your side plate with a martin soft pad and use double sided carpet tape to attach, I would be willing to bet 1/8 more off the arrow and the new side plate will be spot on. then if your left to right is off a little with fletched arrows you can add the double sided tape one piece at a time, this will move the arrow left, if your right handed
John 3:16

Offline Cyclic-Rivers

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17675
Re: Bare shaft tune question (pic)
« Reply #39 on: August 08, 2013, 09:21:00 PM »
Thanks guys.  

Keith it was nice meeting you at Denton even though it was brief.  

I shot broadheads today and they were hitting right where the field points were out to 25 yards.  I was keeping everything in a tennis ball size area which is very very good for me.  

I am happy with the current set up for hunting.
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©