3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?  (Read 359 times)

Offline Bldtrailer

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1055
Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« on: January 15, 2014, 06:43:00 PM »
I was playing with my Dale dye 55@28 (I draw 27)so 52ish and tryed a 2016 bare shaft 281/4 long and shot it with different heads 150-175-200-250 and the 250 time after time shot the best!!??  Is it wrong? I'm going  to fletch up afew and try it through paper(only have the 1 250 head  :banghead: ) and see what  happens.
As we get older our bow weight goes down and our body weight goes up, One of Lifes little jokes.
Bringing Archery to
 Wounded Warriors

Offline Dave Pagel

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 932
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2014, 06:50:00 PM »
It could work.  I draw just a tad over 29 and I am shooting 30 1/8 inch 2016s with a 175 grain broadhead out of a 53# @ 28 St. Joe River recurve.

D.P.

Online black velvet

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 350
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2014, 06:51:00 PM »
It isn't wrong if its working right. Or as they say whatever works for you.

Online black velvet

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 350
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2014, 06:52:00 PM »
It isn't wrong if its working right. Or as they say whatever works for you.

Offline reddogge

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4926
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2014, 06:56:00 PM »
It's not wrong unless you want a faster flatter shooting 2016 but then you'd have to increase the length and decrease the point weight. Depends on your requirements in an arrow.
Traditional Bowhunters of Maryland
Heart of Maryland Bowhunters
NRA
Mayberry Archers

Offline ron w

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 13848
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2014, 07:21:00 PM »
Sounds like a pass thru arrow to me.........if it flies good how can it be wrong, and at hunting distances......perfect!
In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities. In the expert's there are few...So the most difficult thing is always to keep your beginner's mind...This is also the real secret of the arts: always be a beginner.  Shunryu Suzuki

Offline ishoot4thrills

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3445
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2014, 08:44:00 PM »
Depends a lot on your side/strike plate thickness and/or the bow's center-shot cut. I had the same results with 2016s in a similar setup with 28" 2016s. I HAD to put over 200 grains up front with the bow I shot to get it tuned. I'm sure full length would tune better without the weight up front but why change it if it works? I like more FOC weight.
58" JK Traditions Kanati Longbow
Ten Strand D10 String
Kanati Bow Quiver
35/55 Gold Tip Pink Nugents @ 30"
3 X 5" Feathers
19.9% FOC
49# @ 26.75"
165 FPS @ 10.4 GPP (510 gr. hunting arrow)
171 FPS @ 9.7 GPP (475 gr. 3D arrow)
3 Fingers Under

Online Pine

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 4298
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2014, 08:56:00 PM »
Every setup is different and if that is working why not . You will have good weight forward .
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled. Mark Twain

If you're afraid to offend, you can't be honest.

TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline olddogrib

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1365
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2014, 06:05:00 AM »
Nothing wrong if it tunes, but I would have expected heavy FOC more on a 2018 or 2117, but maybe not at that short length.
"Wakan Tanka
 Wakan Tanka
 Pilamaya
 Wichoni heh"

Online KenH

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1040
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2014, 07:47:00 AM »
Who cares about Right or Wrong if it works?  I'll trade perfection for functionally useful any old day!
Living Aboard the s/v ManCave

Offline Lamey

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1677
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2014, 08:20:00 AM »
yep, if it flies right... its right.

Online smokin joe

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3008
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2014, 11:05:00 AM »
What shoots the best IS the best. I used to have a recurve that liked a 2016 with heavy heads -- it is not unheard of. Use what works.
TGMM
Compton
PBS
Trad Gang Hall of Fame

Offline Easykeeper

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1306
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2014, 11:25:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by smokin joe:
What shoots the best IS the best. I used to have a recurve that liked a 2016 with heavy heads -- it is not unheard of. Use what works.
I agree.

Online 58WINTERS

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 638
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2014, 12:32:00 AM »
Nope. 2016 w/250 Hill Wesley Special 55@28 drawn to 27/ 52ish #.  29 BOP 200gr works too. same specs with 35/55 carbons.
58

Offline stagetek

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1741
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2014, 12:54:00 AM »
Certainly not wrong, but a really heavy head. What are you hunting ?

Offline Bldtrailer

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2014, 08:38:00 AM »
Have several 2016s and 6 were  cut to 281/4(dz purchased from another trad gang member)the others are full length so I tryed to see how to tune the 6 cut first>>>--> so far 250 up frount
As we get older our bow weight goes down and our body weight goes up, One of Lifes little jokes.
Bringing Archery to
 Wounded Warriors

Online Tim Finley

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1028
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2014, 10:22:00 AM »
Many are compromising with heavy heads and longer arrows instead of getting the right spine. Too much weight  forward and the pendulum affect is more critical with a not so great release . Try a lighter shaft and 150 grain head I'd bet it will shoot better for you .

Offline rnharris

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2014, 09:34:00 PM »
Shoot what works as long as you are good with arrow flight I shoot full length 500 spine carbons drawing 29" and usually end up with 250 or more but shoot mainly longbows in the low fifties
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline Bldtrailer

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Is 250 on 2016 wrong?
« Reply #18 on: January 20, 2014, 05:41:00 PM »
Just an up date 30 inch with 150-175   :goldtooth:  looking good also>>>--->
As we get older our bow weight goes down and our body weight goes up, One of Lifes little jokes.
Bringing Archery to
 Wounded Warriors

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©