Okay, since this seems to be an opinion thread, I'll add mine. I've had and shot more bows than I can even keep track of anymore of pretty much every style available, except the kind with wheels on the ends
. Therefore, I feel qualified to offer some advice.
For me, the limb design or even that of the riser, make very little difference in terms of forgiveness. What matters for me is how the grip fits my hand. I can shoot almost any bow well...sometimes. The ones that fit my hand correctly, I shoot well every time! The two bows I find most forgiving are of quite different designs, but the grip of each fits my hand perfectly. I can pick up either my Kanati, which is a one piece R/D longbow, or my Orion, which is a three piece static limb recurve, and shoot equally well with either. In fact, I alternated weekends with those two this deer season. It so happened that a doe stopped in front of my when I had the Orion in hand, so I'm making some jerky out of her today. Had I had the Kanati, the outcome would undoubtedly have been the same.
I had a Northern Mist Shelton, which is a fine Hill style bow, but the grip was too small for me...an odd thing since I have short fingers. I could shoot it well at times, but not consistently. A Hill style bow requires a different grip than either of my other bows. Howard Hill described it as like picking up a suitcase. The depth of the grip from belly to back needs to be big enough to force you to grip it the same way each time. My Shelton was too shallow in that area to do so. I really liked the bow as it was smooth and quiet and accurate when I did my part. For hunting, though, I want a bow that I can simply pick up and shoot well without having to consider how I'm holding onto it. I couldn't do that with the Shelton, so I traded it.
I've finally come to the conclusion that the two bows I have listed will do everything I want to do in terms of bow hunting, so I'm done trading...I hope.