3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: A standard test of penetration?  (Read 2136 times)

Offline damascusdave

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3273
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #40 on: August 04, 2014, 12:26:00 AM »
Lots of great ideas on here where someone else does all the work...if it's such a good idea go ahead and do it yourself and tell the rest of us your results

DDave
I set out a while ago to reduce my herd of 40 bows...And I am finally down to 42

Offline Rays Arrow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #41 on: August 04, 2014, 01:07:00 AM »
Thanks 2bird, great detail and excellent pictures
I enjoy the woods taking game is the icing on the cake.

Offline Bladepeek

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3318
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #42 on: August 04, 2014, 09:57:00 AM »
I think I can pick up a lot more scrap cardboard than dead cows, too!
60" Bear Super K LH 40#@28
69" Matt Meacham LH 42@28
66" Swift Wing LH 35@28
54" Java Man Elk Heart LH 43@28
62"/58" RER LXR LH 44/40@28

Offline halfseminole

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 958
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #43 on: August 04, 2014, 10:27:00 AM »
In kenjutsu, we used wet tatami mats rolled around green bamboo to simulate limbs.  I'm noticing a trend here of wet media, as the inside of an animal is wet as well and firing into a wet medium is a far better gauge of penetration on a live creature.

I know how to mix ballistics gel, but it's a question of did we all mix it properly or not.  There are several formulas online that use easily gotten materials, but it would add up in price over time.  Wet newspaper is the best idea I've seen thus far.  Cardboard is not all created equal.

  • Guest
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #44 on: August 04, 2014, 10:42:00 AM »
I know of a case where a cow was tested, a fellow with a low fifties Hill longbow was given a dry cow. His arrow went through the cow and into the hog pen. If I remember right it was a Hill head on a cedar arrow.

Offline ChuckC

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 6775
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #45 on: August 04, 2014, 10:58:00 AM »
The way the current test facility is designed, tape holding it in place from the bottom is going to allow a large amount of movement, which WILL hinder performance, as well as hinder it in increments ; the higher (away from the tape) the hit, the more likely that cardboard is to flex; the more you hit the cardboard, the flimsier the connection to the base unit.  we need something that won't flex and won't change.
ChuckC

Offline 2bird

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 389
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #46 on: August 04, 2014, 11:24:00 AM »
lol I think we should put Chuck in charge of QA
Vegetarians are cool, I eat them with every meal!

Offline nightowl1

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 507
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #47 on: August 04, 2014, 11:37:00 AM »
Based on what everyone has said, I'm going to make up my frame this evening after work with a method of securing it like you said, Chuck. If I have time to go to the grocery store, I'll grab some cardboard too. Hopefully shoot some tomorrow and pics by wednesday with my measurements.

I'm not worried about mimicing the flesh by having it more liquid. Its far more important to have a consistent medium. There are too many variables with saturating paper to get consistency between everyone's trials. Ambient temperature, amount of water vs paper weight, length of time... Let's settle on dry cardboard for now.

Bladepeek and 2bird correct me if I'm wrong but if there is any validity to this the end answer would end up as follows:
A bow with X amount of penetration at 10 yards has X +/- the amount of penetration as another bow. That is all that can be determined. The larger the sample size and the more proven hunting setups we try we should find a range of penetration in the target medium that can have a correlation to an adequate hunting setup. Not a threshold of lethality but a threshold of confidence.

That is all I'm saying. Simply applying the scientific process.
Combo Hunter 46@28

I came from nothing and I brought it with me.

Offline 2bird

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 389
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #48 on: August 04, 2014, 11:47:00 AM »
yep pretty much. I spoke to my brother and he shoots a 45# recurve also, in fact his arrows are within 20 grains of mine, he draws 26" and I draw 27 3/4", we both will use the same broadhead for testing purposes and it should make for an interesting comparison.
Vegetarians are cool, I eat them with every meal!

Offline ChuckC

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 6775
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #49 on: August 04, 2014, 01:00:00 PM »
2 bird, I retired from that stuff, get someone else !

hehehe
ChuckC

Offline DaveT1963

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 893
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #50 on: August 04, 2014, 01:53:00 PM »
I dont see how testing on a live animal is standardized?  Muscle density, hair/fur density, is bone contacted, angle of shot, moving or standing and 100 other variables might effect results?  My broadhead arrows never fully penetrate my dirt pile, and seldom are they burried to the exact same depth.... but I am not worried about what they will do on any N. American Game Animal.
Everything has a price - the more we accept, the more the cost

Caribow Tuktu ET 53# @ 27 Inches
Thunderhorn takedown longbow 55# @ 27
Lots of James Berry Bows

Online Terry Green

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 28777
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #51 on: August 05, 2014, 11:55:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by killinstuff:
I like testing penetration on animals.  Anything less then a hole in and hole out is poor penetration.
Unless you peg the off shoulder    :D    :D    :D
Tradbowhunting Video Store - https://digitalstore.tradgang.com/

Tradgang Bowhunting Merchandise - https://tradgang.creator-spring.com/?

Tradgang DVD - https://www.tradgang.com/tgstore/index.html

"It's important,  when going after a goal, to never lose sight of the integrity of the journey" - Andy Garcia

'An anchor point is not a destination, its  an evolution to conclusion'

Offline brianbfree

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 97
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #52 on: August 05, 2014, 10:34:00 PM »
As a Special Education Teacher I am against all forms of standardized testing.   :smileystooges:
DH Super Diablo         60#@28
DH Ventura              60#@28
BP Lord Mercury         40#@28
Golden Sovereign Knight 65#@28
BP  Mercury Hunter      65#@28

Brian Beery

Offline Hawken1911

  • Moderator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 467
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #53 on: August 06, 2014, 06:57:00 AM »
That just made my day.    :D  (I'm also a teacher)
ST. HUBERT'S RANGERS, Brotherhood of the Medieval Hunt.
MICHIGAN LONGBOW ASSOCIATION
Scott Spears Osage English longbow,50#@28"

Offline Hawken1911

  • Moderator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 467
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #54 on: August 06, 2014, 06:57:00 AM »
That just made my day.     :D   (I'm also a teacher)
ST. HUBERT'S RANGERS, Brotherhood of the Medieval Hunt.
MICHIGAN LONGBOW ASSOCIATION
Scott Spears Osage English longbow,50#@28"

Offline BenBow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4690
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #55 on: August 06, 2014, 09:15:00 AM »
Water jugs cheap and realistic unless you have hard water    :knothead:     :deadhorse:
But his bow will remain steady, and his hands will be skillful; because of the hands of the Mighty One of Jacob, because of the Shepherd, the Rock of Israel,  (Genesis 49:24 [NETfree])

Offline tracker12

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1796
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #56 on: August 06, 2014, 11:03:00 AM »
I am with others that have posted that the only way to choose a broadhead is after seeing how they do on real game.  I like penetrations as much as anyone else but for me I like to see what the BH does as it cuts through the animal.  You see very little discussion about Wound channel which I thnk is very important.  I have shot deer with a bunch of different BH's and some just seem to cause more bleeding and quicker kills.  The last couple years I have shot VPA three blades.  The wound channel from them seem more like a hole that a smooth cut.
T ZZZZ

Offline beaunaro

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 759
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #57 on: August 06, 2014, 12:19:00 PM »
When you guys run out of boxes and can't eat any more pizza, just send it to me via overnight USPS.

I promise I will return the empty boxes for you to play with, so long as you don't mind a few holes in them.

   :biglaugh:    :archer2:
Irv Eichorst

Offline wallybowman

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 49
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #58 on: August 07, 2014, 08:46:00 AM »
I agree with others cardboard does come in different methods of construction. Trying different cardboard boxes over the years I have found that some types will peel apart at the edges even if they are compressed. Now I mostly use Styrofoam boxes a co-worker's $6,000-a-dose medicine comes on. They are around 12"X6"X8", the insides having a rectangular pocket 1" deep and 4X4". I tape the lid shut with two-sided tape. Putting two boxes front - to - back works really well with field points but broadhead tipped arrows usually blow through when using my heavy weight bows. Shooting through the sides of these boxes yields much less penetrationr as the boxes are more solid. And the higher the foc the greater the penetration, such as with a 2117 fronted with a 260 grain field point.
In the wind he's still alive

Online Tajue17

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2840
Re: A standard test of penetration?
« Reply #59 on: August 08, 2014, 05:39:00 PM »
after I learned about all the kills by people using 40-45lb bows and 8 to 10 gpi arrows I pretty much fell back in the chair realizing I can pretty much use any set up I want with my gear and I'm good to go.

its the arrow flight with those broadheads that should be the big concern because there are a lot of people out there that get crappy flight with their once field pointed arrows that now have broadheads for deer season and they either don't correct it and try to make it work or they just figure they have a "best or #1" arrow that seems to hit pretty good so they'll shoot that first and the other arrows are pretty much in the quiver to look good.

you guys know where I'm going with this but if anyone takes penetration seriously then arrow flight and perfectly matching shafting to your bow is key to not only consistent arrow after arrow accuracy but KE or what I call Pass thru Potential is at its highest,,,, then of course keep em sharp and pick a spot is part of the recipe also.

sadly I really can't pay any attention to penetration anything threads because I'm too close to deer season,,, this is all said with a smile but I can't be 2nd guessing my gear right now I'll be shooting Ace Broadheads on snag arrows that fly like lasers out of my Morning Star or Vixen both 56# if I don't see a pass thru I'm coming back to this forum and show a video of me breaking those two bows over the bridge of my nose......

as for pizza if it isn't all spoken for I'm a big fan of Garlic & Feta or Anchovy with Roasted peppers (what can I say I grew up in Boston) along with a frozen 22oz mug of Sams Summer Ale.
"Us vs Them"

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©