3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Continuing broadhead debate..  (Read 367 times)

Offline Wheels2

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1040
Continuing broadhead debate..
« on: August 22, 2014, 01:19:00 PM »
For deer hunting I will be shooting a recurve pulling 54# @29" draw.  Shooting a 440 grain GT .400 spine, 31" long.  I acquired a supply of Zwickey Eskilites, some factory adapters and some with the glue-ins.  They weigh just under 150 grains and fly very well for me.  However, I would prefer to shoot a three blade Snuffer, just for the extra cut.
I still have concerns about the potential penetration reduction when using the Snuffers vs the Zwickeys.
If you were shooting this rig, would you switch to the Snuffers for extra cut or stay with Zwickeys for the extra penetration potential?
Super Curves.....
Covert Hunter Hex9h
Morrison Max 6 ILF
Mountain Muffler strings to keep them quiet
Shoot as much weight as you can with accuracy

Offline Hermon

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2127
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2014, 01:22:00 PM »
Get either one sharp and put it in the right spot and it won't matter which one you are shooting.

Offline joe skipp

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4314
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2014, 01:41:00 PM »
Read the above comment....nuff said.
"Neal...is this heaven?" "No Piute but we are dam close". Top of the Mtn in Medicine Bow Nat Forest.

Offline NBK

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1374
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2014, 01:45:00 PM »
agreed with the first two guys.
If you're pulling 29" you have enough horsepower to shoot snuffers.  (I really like snuffers because I can get them sharp).
Mike


"I belong anywhere but in between"

Offline DanielB89

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2824
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2014, 01:59:00 PM »
A 3 blade is far superior in cutting surface.  Just think about how the 3rd blade makes the cross cut.  

But i do not think a 2 blade is at all lacking ANYTHING is "killing power".  

with that being said, I'll be shooting 2 blades this year! lol.  

Stick with what you have, make a good shot and you wont have to worry about much.
"Blessed is the man who trusts in the LORD And whose trust is the LORD. Jeremiah 17:7

"There is a way which seems right to a man,
But its end is the way of death."  Proverbs 14:12

Offline fnshtr

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2631
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2014, 02:25:00 PM »
Agree with the guys above... especially for deer sized and smaller animals.

Now, go out and prove it!

Good luck.
56" Kempf Kwyk Styk 50@28
54" Java Man Elkheart 50@28
WVBA Member
1 John 3:1

Offline 2bird

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 389
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2014, 02:51:00 PM »
this is from a different post. take it for what it's worth to you. If you want Snuffers PM me...


I tried 2 different broadheads, shot both into 15 layers of cardboard (that’s all I had not 20 sorry). The penetration was fairly consistent +/- 1" or so. here are my averages from 10 - 20 - 30 yards

Equipment

Bow: Hoyt Dorado 45@28 I draw 27 ¾, with below arrow with 125 grain field points it chrono’s 198 fps.

Arrow: Easton Stalker Extreme 500's 31" with 4" feathers. 265 grains with no point.

Broadheads

Zwickey Eskilite w/5/16" bleeders 135 grain, total arrow weight is 400 grains.

Magnus Snuffers 125 grains, total arrow weight is 390 grains.

both broadheads were sharp enough to pop rubber bands/shave hair.

10 Yards
Zwickey, 24.5"
Snuffers, 19.5"

20 Yards
Zwickey, 23.5"
Snuffers, 18.25"

30 Yards
Zwickey, 10"
Snuffers, 5"
Vegetarians are cool, I eat them with every meal!

Offline ChuckC

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 6775
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2014, 04:05:00 PM »
If they fly great already, I wouldn't change anything, not for the extra cut or the extra penetration but because they fly great and both will work just fine anyway.

ChuckC

Online Gordon Jabben

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1062
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2014, 04:33:00 PM »
I would shoot both broadheads and purposely short draw and have a bad release because that is most likely what I do in a hunting situation and then I'd take whichever broadhead flies the best under these conditions. All joking aside, I agree with ChuckC, if the broadhead you are using now flies will in hunting situations, I would keep using it.

Offline Gooserbat

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 547
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2014, 04:40:00 PM »
There is a reason a Zwickey has been around so long.  The same can be applied to the Snuffer but if what you got is shooting fine then don't mess with it.
"Four fletch white feathers and 600 grains is a beautiful thing."

Offline TxAg

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2910
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #10 on: August 22, 2014, 04:50:00 PM »
How about a 4 blake Zwickey Eskimo? Best of both worlds.

Offline Etter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 608
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #11 on: August 22, 2014, 06:01:00 PM »
If you think a three blade is superior in cutting surface, you haven't shot simmons heads.  The tree shark makes a hole you could put your hand through, and it'll do it on a whitetail, bear, or pig out of a 45lb bow.

Offline Orion

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8252
  • Contributing Member
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #12 on: August 22, 2014, 06:07:00 PM »
The weight of your arrow (440 grains, 8gpp) will have as much to do with penetration as which of these two broad heads you choose.  If you want to increase penetration, bump up your arrow weight with a 100 grain insert behind the head.

Offline SlowBowinMO

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2540
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #13 on: August 22, 2014, 11:03:00 PM »
You have plenty of steam for Snuffers, there is nothing wrong with your Zwickies though.  I would likely get a few Snuffers and carry both in my quiver for however the mood strikes me.  I honestly can't remember the last time I had only one kind of broadhead in my quiver.
"Down-Log Blind at Misty River"

  • Guest
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2014, 01:24:00 AM »
Gordon may have been joking, but even Byron Fergusson takes the shorter drawn hunting shot on game into consideration. If your arrows go totally out of wack with an inch shorter draw that is something to consider.

Offline monkeyball

  • Moderator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 1745
Re: Continuing broadhead debate..
« Reply #15 on: August 23, 2014, 07:30:00 PM »
Zwickeys work for me,and like already said above,they have been around a long time. Somethings working right!


 

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©