Originally posted by overbo:
I don't care how much you study the photos. Medic looks and sounds to be an accomplished bowhunter and understands shot angle, sharpness, ect,ect. If you kill enough game w/ a bow and arrow, one will realize that a sizeable % of where you thought you hit game isn't reality.
Buck fever is a very hard thing for some to overcome, me included. I can knock the crap out of my dot and 3D target but for me, nothing replaces shooting at a live animal.
I agree overbo, but the point of the of the pictures was to illustrate exactly where the "dot" should actually be.
There are a lot of very good archers/hunters that continue to have trouble getting the results they want on live game. They blame it on things such as buck fever, not picking a spot, rushing the shot, the animal ducking the string, etc. Those are all valid things that do indeed happen, but in many cases the hunter did exactly what he set out to do, and did hit
exactly where he thought he did. Unfortunately, the spot he was looking at, and ultimately hit, was not the spot the contained the vital organs.
Taken in isolation, the good stuff is all pretty much located directly above the leg, not so much behind it. Get too far behind it and while you might have a fatal hit, you have a very long, often unsuccessful tracking job on your hands.
Hitting the spot is only half the battle. Knowing where the right spot is, is the other half. Few of us ever hit
exactly what we are looking at. Misses of a few inches right/left/up/down are common. Why start out aiming at
edge of the kill zone and not the
middle (which is almost directly above the leg on a whitetail deer)?
When you start out aiming at the middle, you have a 360 degree margin for error. If you aim at one edge, you cut that margin for error to 180 degrees.