There are many good binoculars on the market. Most already mentioned in previous posts.
A lot of folks concentrate on 'where' they will use them, deep woods, open woodlands, mountains, etc.
And that's important. But 'how' they are used is more important. For example, if they are used as quick checks of what's lies ahead (a minute or less viewing), I'd go with the least expensive combination of power, field of view, water proofing, etc. that I will need for the most common terrain I hunt.
If you often spend several minutes looking through the binoculars, perhaps up to a half hour of detailed looking at a time, consider the Zeiss, Leica and Swarovski's of the world.
I know a lot of folks laugh at the high prices and a quick look through them side by side with lower cost alternatives in a store doesn't show any noticeable difference. But prolonged viewing has shown me a real difference related to eye fatigue. I hunt a lot in the wooded farmlands in southern Ohio and Indiana and hunt from the ground. I'm amazed at how many deer I can actually see by glassing a 180 degree arc around by blind continuously. Well, at least 15-20 minutes at a time. Even if the distance I can see is only a 100 yards, I use my Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 often and for extended viewing sessions. Deer sneaking through thickets are easy to miss with the naked eye, but not with the binoculars. I don't know enough about optics to explain why I can look through the CL's without eye strain for extended periods of viewing, but can't with Bushnell Legends of about the same power. Something to consider.