This is really interesting to read. . .
I rode the wave of traditional archery which was around in Michigan in the 50s/60s- it waned some in the 70s with the intro of the compound. THEN there was a rapidly growing return of trad in the early 80s. We were influenced by the Wensels, John Schulz, Fred Asbell, Byron Ferguson, Ron Laclair, Ken Beck. . and a few others.
What I find interesting as I really do not recall much trad talk in the terms used throughout this thread (shot sequence, etc etc). The thought of trad/instinctive was simplicity for hunting. It was all fluid, like shooting a basketball. We watched Ron LaClair shoot skoal cans out of the air, shoot with his feet, and determine his brace height with his fist and thumb (no bow square technicality there!) I recall an article Barry Wensel (maybe Gene??) wrote how it was easier to hunt shooting trad/instinctive. Many of us became convinced and returned to our trad roots. Like others- I DID NOT make the switch back for the challenge!! I switched because I wanted bowhunting to be easier!
Just for the fun. . .Some of you newer trad guys go watch (and LISTEN) to John Schulz's "Hitting em like Howard Hill" on youtube. Notice his personal philosophy. Really listen. That was representative of the key voices many of us were reading and hearing.
I realize there are many guys who like all the technical aspects to shooting, tuning, and equipment. I also realize that most of the guys who learned like me never became big time archery tournament champions. But I do wonder if newer trad guys realize that MANY of us just learned a few basic things/form issues- and for the most part we just went and "played ball." Few of us became great tournament archers- but we sure harvested A LOT of game at 18yds and less. It was fun and we got better as we enjoyed the simplicity of a stick and string.
Just some reflections this evening. Worth probably 2C
Dan in KS